lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
06 November 2025 by Olivia Grace-Curran

ESG investing proves resilient amid global uncertainty

Despite global ESG adoption dipping slightly from record highs, Asia Pacific investors remain deeply committed to sustainable investing
icon

Cboe licence attractive to potential buyers: ASIC

Cboe’s recent success in acquiring a market operation license will make the exchange more attractive to incoming buyers, ...

icon

NAB profit steady as margins tighten and costs rise

The major bank has posted a stable full-year profit as margin pressures and remediation costs offset strong lending and ...

icon

LGT heralds Aussie fixed income 'renaissance'

Despite the RBA’s cash rate hold, the domestic bond market is in good shape compared to its international counterparts, ...

icon

Stonepeak to launch ASX infrastructure debt note

Global alternative investment firm Stonepeak is breaking into Australia with the launch of an ASX-listed infrastructure ...

icon

Analysts split on whether bitcoin’s bull run holds

A further 10 per cent dip in the price of bitcoin after a pullback this week could prompt ETF investors to exit the ...

VIEW ALL

More losers from award modernisation

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
5 minute read

While the award modernisation process has been tagged as a retail versus industry fund stoush, more and more industry insiders are starting to say state-based, multi-industry funds could be the most disadvantaged.

As the Australian Industrial Relations Commission's (AIRC) award modernisation process rolls on after the second tranche announcement earlier this month, the division between industry and retail superannuation funds has further widened.

No retail funds were nominated in the second tranche, while several stand-alone corporate funds received a guernsey.

In the first tranche announced earlier this year, only one retail fund, AMP, made the grade.

Twelve not-for-profit funds were chosen, with AustralianSuper and Sunsuper being nominated in seven awards.

 
 

Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) chief executive Richard Gilbert has been vocal in his opposition to the process, saying it is handing the industry sector a virtual monopoly and will deny Australians access to some of the most cost-effective super funds in the marketplace.

While it seems the retail sector has been left out in the cold, there are murmurs the award modernisation process is also causing rifts within the industry fund sector.

Speaking at the Australian Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Roadshow held in Sydney last week, ASFA research and resource centre director Ross Clare said state-based, multi-industry funds and small industry funds have also not been named.

"The process has been helpful for large, national industry funds, but state-based unions and brands are left out of the process," Clare says.

John Paul, chief executive of multi-industry fund Asset Super, agrees.

"The national funds with close affiliations with the Australian Council of Trade Unions have more ties to the federal arbitration system. The state system is dead, so the multi-industry funds are going to be the most disadvantaged," Paul says.

Despite this ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos says state-based funds need to work their contacts and get involved in the process.

"Those that want to come to the table should be able to," Vamos says.

Clare says the introduction of grandfathering provisions should protect the retail and smaller funds that have so far been left out of the process.

The grandfathering provisions allow that funds to which employers were making contributions to on or before 12 September 2008 will be permitted as default funds.

"There will be some impact on public sector funds but not too much due to enterprise agreements," Clare says.

"Corporate funds are usually protected by enterprise agreements or 'great grandfathering' of default fund arrangements."

The new awards come into effect in January 2010.