Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

IFSA welcomes FPA fee consultation paper

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
4 minute read

FPA paper will provide good feedback on how planners might move towards a fee-for-service model, IFSA says.

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has welcomed the FPA's consultation paper that outlines plans to phase out commissions.

"The FPA has developed a strong discussion paper for their members to comment on," IFSA deputy chief executive John O'Shaughnessy said.

"It's obviously an issue that's on the table at the moment and this process will get a good response on the members' position on it."

O'Shaughnessy said IFSA would be interested in how the process continues.

 
 

"There are an awful lot of fee-for-service models out there and I think most planning groups now offer the option of a fee-for-service or commission or a hybrid system," O'Shaughnessy said.

"But this consultation process would be a good way to understand how quickly the industry or the planners might move towards that fee-for-service model."

According to O'Shaughnessy, the industry has been moving well to make the consumer aware of what they're paying and what they should expect to be paying.

However, planners still had a choice as to whether to offer a fee-for-service or commission-based service.

On Friday, the FPA released a member consultation paper on financial planning remuneration that recommended all members move to a fee-based or a client-directed remuneration model by 2012.