Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

PIS denies MIS profit threat

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
5 minute read

PIS maintains its position is strong despite Great Southern and Timbercorp exposure.

Australia's largest financial planning group, Professional Investment Services (PIS), has denied media reports saying its exposure to Great Southern and Timbercorp investments threatens its future profitability.

"I'm keen for the correct information to come out and I think there is a fair bit of speculation that is incorrect," PIS managing director Grahame Evans said.

Last week, The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) reported that the loss of the 10 per cent commission that PIS planners gained from recommending agribusiness managed investment schemes (MIS) would place the future profitability of the planning group in jeopardy.

It also claimed that during 2008-09 PIS received undisclosed payments worth $70,000 from agribusiness schemes known as strategic partnership agreements.

 
 

"From our perspective we are no different to anyone else, we didn't get any special arrangements as has been speculated," Evans said.

"People can see our financials on the ASIC website - it's not something that you can hide."

According to the SMH, Great Southern, Timbercorp and other MIS were important to PIS because of "soft-dollar sponsorships".

However, Evans said that at no time did PIS pressure planners to write business for any incentive-related reasons.

"We have been investing in these products for 12 years and have never had a problem before. Everyone wants to have a shot at PIS because of who we are," Evans said.

While Evans declined to comment on PIS's exposure to Great Southern and Timbercorp, he revealed that Great Southern made up 1.5 per cent of funds under management (FUM).

He said investments in Timbercorp were also a relatively small component of PIS's business.

"It is about a quarter of 1 per cent of total flows and 0.4 of a per cent of total FUM," Evans said.

"We have been investing in these funds for over 12 years, so of course you are going to have a lot of funds invested. But if you break down the amount invested over 12 years then it makes sense," he said.

According to the IFA Dealer Group Survey published in October last year, PIS's total funds under advice were about $18 billion.