Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

PIS denies MIS profit threat

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
5 minute read

PIS maintains its position is strong despite Great Southern and Timbercorp exposure.

Australia's largest financial planning group, Professional Investment Services (PIS), has denied media reports saying its exposure to Great Southern and Timbercorp investments threatens its future profitability.

"I'm keen for the correct information to come out and I think there is a fair bit of speculation that is incorrect," PIS managing director Grahame Evans said.

Last week, The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) reported that the loss of the 10 per cent commission that PIS planners gained from recommending agribusiness managed investment schemes (MIS) would place the future profitability of the planning group in jeopardy.

It also claimed that during 2008-09 PIS received undisclosed payments worth $70,000 from agribusiness schemes known as strategic partnership agreements.

 
 

"From our perspective we are no different to anyone else, we didn't get any special arrangements as has been speculated," Evans said.

"People can see our financials on the ASIC website - it's not something that you can hide."

According to the SMH, Great Southern, Timbercorp and other MIS were important to PIS because of "soft-dollar sponsorships".

However, Evans said that at no time did PIS pressure planners to write business for any incentive-related reasons.

"We have been investing in these products for 12 years and have never had a problem before. Everyone wants to have a shot at PIS because of who we are," Evans said.

While Evans declined to comment on PIS's exposure to Great Southern and Timbercorp, he revealed that Great Southern made up 1.5 per cent of funds under management (FUM).

He said investments in Timbercorp were also a relatively small component of PIS's business.

"It is about a quarter of 1 per cent of total flows and 0.4 of a per cent of total FUM," Evans said.

"We have been investing in these funds for over 12 years, so of course you are going to have a lot of funds invested. But if you break down the amount invested over 12 years then it makes sense," he said.

According to the IFA Dealer Group Survey published in October last year, PIS's total funds under advice were about $18 billion.