Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

MIS operator gets six-year ban

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
2 minute read

The operator of a South Australian MIS business gets a six-year ban after an ASIC investigation.

Jonathan West has been banned from providing financial services for six years after an ASIC investigation into his private managed investment business.

The ban comes after proceedings were brought by ASIC in the Supreme Court of South Australia and follow a decision by Justice Gray on 9 May 2008.

ASIC found that between June 2003 and March 2007, John West and the business John West & Associates (JWA) operated a managed investment scheme (MIS) that was not registered and did not hold an Australian financial services licence.

JWA also did not provide a product disclosure statement to potential investors and made offers or accepted offers from retail clients to acquire interests in the scheme when it was not registered.

 
 

Despite being put on notice in May 2005 that the scheme was contravening the Corporations Act 2001, West continued to operate the scheme.

ASIC also found that West intended to circumvent a restraining order made by the Supreme Court in March 2007 by continuing to solicit funds from investors in the scheme.

The managed investment business engaged in a scheme of borrowing money from members of the public to on-lend to others on the security of mortgages. It involved more than 60 investors with loans and contributions totalling more than $15.2 million.