Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

Frontier gets tough on fees

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
5 minute read

As Frontier finalises a number of mandates, fee structures are becoming more important.

Asset consultant Frontier Investment Consulting is ploughing ahead with its fee restructure proposition, despite little support from fund managers.

Frontier managing director Fiona Trafford-Walker said the investment consultancy firm was currently working on the practical implementation of the fee and alignment of interest philosophy it had been discussing in the past 12 months. 

Based on a flat dollar fee and share of excess return, a number of of Frontier's clients are now looking at how this philosophy can be applied at their funds.

While fund managers did not necessarily need to offer such structures to win business, Trafford-Walker said Frontier would be encouraging superannuation funds to take the fee structures into account when deciding on where to put their money as mandates were finalised in the coming months.

 
 

"We'll basically say that these are the fee models, but if fund managers want to be ahead of the game they should consider rethinking their fee structures. We are also encouraging clients to walk away from managers with fee structures that are clearly too expensive or that result in poor alignment of interest," she said.

One client was close to announcing a new mandate with a global equity fund that had a flat dollar fee and a performance fee, she said.

"That manager is backing themselves and if they don't do well they will just cover costs, and if they do well, then there will be upside for them that is shared with the client," she said.

Last year, Frontier sent a letter to all external fund managers of its superannuation fund clients proposing the idea of charging flat dollar fees on investment mandates.

Trafford-Walker said there had been a good response from superannuation funds, but unsurprisingly not as good a response from fund managers.

"I don't think fund managers want to see a radical change in the current fee model, after all, it serves them very well. But it is not in members' or sponsors' interests to pay out large fees and just get market, or worse, returns. Low-cost passive management is a good option if market returns are the goal. The combination of flat dollar fees and a performance-based fee mean that clients don't pay high fees to managers when they don't do well, which is the way it should be," she said.

"But if they want to be ahead of the game, they should consider it."