Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
09 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s governance and lending weight to ...
icon

Silver’s record performance riding ‘dual tailwinds’, Global X says

Silver ETFs are drawing record inflows, fuelled by strong industrial demand, gold’s upward momentum, and global interest ...

icon

Conaghan says Labor has retreated from ‘flawed’ super tax

The shadow financial services minister has confirmed Labor’s retreat from the proposed $3 million super tax, describing ...

icon

Ausbil backs active edge with new dividend ETF

The Australian fund manager Ausbil has launched an active ETF designed to provide investors with resilient income, ...

icon

Combet hails $27bn gain as portfolio shifts pay off

The Future Fund has posted a $27.4 billion increase in value to $252.3 billion, driven by strong equity markets, ...

icon

Global funds outperform as Australian equities lag benchmarks

Active fund managers in Australia face mixed fortunes as global equities and real estate outperform but domestic ...

VIEW ALL

Privatisation considered for Future Fund

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The privatisation of the Future Fund is part of a welfare policy shake-up by a national think tank.

Reliance on the country's welfare system could be eased by redistributing money in the Future Fund to Australians said a report by the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS).

The report, "The Government Giveth and the Government Taketh Away", looks at a range of strategies that would assist people from opting out of a welfare system.

One option is to transfer the money from the Future Fund to all Australians in the form of 20 million new personal savings accounts.

These accounts, called personal future fund (PFF), could be used for health or unemployment benefits.

This policy makes economic sense and is ethically justifiable, said CIS social research director Peter Saunders.

"Money transferred from the government's Future Fund into 20 million individual accounts would not be spent on immediate consumption, but would be used to replace present or future calls on government benefits or services," Saunders said.

"Assuming the value of the Future Fund reaches $60 billion by 2008, and equal share-out among all permanent residents in Australia (including children) could provide everyone with their own PFF worth around $3,000," the report said.

An additional $750 million would have to be earmarked each year after that so that newborn children could have a PFF equivalent to the value of those funds established earlier. People moving to Australia would have to establish their own PFF before taking up residence in the country.

These PFFs could be linked to people's existing superannuation accounts in order to share administrative costs. These accounts could be run by the superannuation fund's financial managers.