Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for FY2024–25, driven by a recovery in ...
icon

Markets climb 'wall of worry' to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

icon

ASIC levy for investment and super sector set to rise 9%

The corporate regulator has released its estimated industry levies for FY2024–25, with the cost for the investment ...

icon

Diversified portfolios deliver for industry funds as markets flourish

Another strong year for equities, both domestic and global, has driven largely positive returns for these industry super ...

icon

VanEck warns of looming US asset unwind as key risk signals flash red

VanEck has signalled an impending major unwinding in US assets, after issuing a warning that the world is largely ...

icon

Metrics makes 2 acquisitions ahead of consumer lending expansion

Metrics Credit Partners has completed the acquisition of Taurus Financial Group and BC Investment Group as it looks to ...

VIEW ALL

Peak bodies split on pension age issue

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The proposal to lift the pension age will send shivers through many Australians, according to one major industry lobby group.

Industry bodies are divided over calls made by a leading Australian think tank to raise the pension age.

On Wednesday the Committee for Economic Development of Australia (CEDA) called for the Federal Government to lift the retirement age from 65 to 67.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) welcomed the measure.

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) and the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), however, slammed the proposal saying that blue collar workers would be disadvantaged.

"We already have very good policy settings at present in our retirement system. This announcement by CEDA will send shivers through working class and middle class Australians, especially those in manual labour," IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert said.

AIST said low income earners would also be unfairly affected by the proposal.

"If the retirement age is lifted, it will be lower income earners who will end up having to work to 67 because they are most reliant on the age pension," AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said.

"High income earners with more savings and assets will be less affected as they will have far more choice and flexibility about retirement, allowing them to scale down work or not work at all," she said.

ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos supported the proposal.

"Providing a supportive and encouraging environment for people to work past the age of 65 makes a lot of sense.  It will provide older Australians with a sense of purpose. I have always believed that 60 is the new 40," Vamos said.

Vamos, however, called on the Federal Government to look at others measures to increase the adequacy of people's retirement savings.

Gilbert said more consultation will be needed if the proposal was to be considered by the Federal Government.