Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
07 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Fund managers warn of ‘low to no returns’ as US fiscal risks mount

The US has long been seen as an economic powerhouse benefiting from low borrowing costs and strong growth, but with the passage of the so-called “One ...
icon

Finalists for the Australian Wealth Management Awards revealed

The finalists for the Australian Wealth Management Awards 2025 have been revealed, shining a spotlight on the top ...

icon

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment ...

icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

VIEW ALL

Industry funds outperform

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

Industry funds are again the top performers, but awareness needs to increase around the risks of having money in unlisted assets.

Nine out of the 10 top-performing funds are not-for-profit funds, according to the latest survey results from research firm Chant West.

Mercer was the only retail fund in Chant West's performance table.

However, people must be aware that the strong performance of the not-for-profit funds is because of greater exposure to unlisted assets, according to Chant West principal Warren Chant.

Industry funds have a strategic allocation to unlisted assets of about 25 per cent versus 7 per cent for master trusts, which place a greater premium on liquidity, Chant said.

 
 

"In assessing funds, members need to clearly understand there is a key difference between the two groups.

"They should also be aware of the associated risks of not being able to access your money when you need to, versus the risk of earning lower long-term returns," he said.

Commercial funds, however, dominated the medium-sized corporate plan category.

In this category, the four commercial master trusts; AMP Signature, Mercer, Plum and Russell were in the top six funds.

AustralianSuper and Sunsuper were the only industry funds in the group.

"Individuals are price takers, but in the medium-sized corporate market companies have more bargaining power. As a result, they can generally negotiate competitive fees with master trusts that compare favourably with not-for-profit funds," Chant said.

Only six funds were represented in this section because the universe of funds is smaller, according to Chant West.