Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
10 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Investors flock to copper ETF as Trump tariff sparks record price surge

Australian investors are reportedly pouring into Global X’s Copper Miners ETF after copper prices hit record highs this week, spurred by President ...
icon

L1 Capital merger to ‘inject new life into Platinum’: Morningstar

The deal between Platinum Asset Management and L1 Capital will help arrest the organic business decline of Platinum and ...

icon

Former Platinum exec joins Atrium in freshly created role

The multi-asset investment manager has announced the appointment of Charlie Brooks to the newly created position of ...

icon

SEC clarity sets stage for Australia’s next crypto ETF push

Australia’s cryptocurrency ETF market could be poised for its next wave of development as US regulators open the door to ...

icon

Defence and precious metals top ETF charts in first half of 2025

Defence and precious metals have emerged as the strongest-performing ETF sectors over the past six months, fuelled by ...

icon

‘This is a new RBA’: Economists caught off guard by surprise decision

Economists have been left scrambling to recalibrate after the Reserve Bank wrong-footed markets on Tuesday, holding the ...

VIEW ALL

Super liquidity risk could spark system breakdown

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

A single fund experiencing liquidity stress could set off a contagion effect that engulfs the industry, investment consulting firm Mercer says.

A small number of superannuation funds unable to fund their liabilities could trigger a significant systemic risk in the superannuation industry, according to Mercer investment consulting business leader Simon Eagleton.

"The single biggest risk facing this industry is liquidity mismatch risk," Eagleton told a Mercer conference this week.

Liquidity mismatch risk occurs when a superannuation fund is unable to fund its liabilities, such as transfer rollovers and member option switches.

"The problem, of course, is that most super fund assets are not as liquid as their liabilities," Eagleton said.

 
 

Therefore, the liquidity mismatch had the potential to lead to systemic risk, he said.

"It is entirely plausible that a single fund finding itself in liquidity stress could lead to a contagion effect engulfing the industry," he said.

This would result in systemic risks that include loss of confidence in Australia's compulsory superannuation system, a growing move by fund members to use cash options and lower voluntary contributions.

Eagleton said the top-performing funds in Chant West's latest survey had exposure to illiquid assets that was three times the broader industry average.

The top eight performing funds in the survey had on average a strategic weight to illiquid assets of 27 per cent, with three of the funds holding more than 36 per cent in unlisted assets.

"So clearly we have a liquidity mismatch," Eagleton said.

To reduce the systemic liquidity mismatch risk, he said greater disclosure was needed.

Superannuation funds should move towards full and truthful public disclosure of their liquidity position, he said.

A regulatory constraint on asset allocation of illiquid assets was not the answer as it would only lead to sub-optimal investment outcomes, he said.

"My view is that the most sensible regulatory response is to enforce much better disclosure of liquidity issues than we have at the moment," he said.