Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

FPA slams AFA

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

The AFA is wrong on adviser remuneration and its position is nothing more than an attempt to recruit FPA members, the association says.

The Association of Financial Advisers' (AFA) call to financial planners to reject a move away from commissions was disappointing and short-sighted, FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.

On Wednesday the AFA raised concerns about the FPA consultation paper, which outlined a transition by financial planners to a fee-for-service model.

AFA chief executive Richard Klipin said banning commissions takes away a consumer's fundamental right to choose, a right which has been enshrined in legislation since 2004.

"We are not banning commissions, rather encouraging our members to transition to fee-based remuneration models to protect the profession and consumers," Bloch said.

 
 

"The reality is that continuing to use a commission-based approach leaves planners open to accusations of conflict of interest and of lacking transparency."

Bloch also rejected the AFA's arguments that a fee-based approach would make financial advice unaffordable for many Australians.

"An asset-based fee, directed by the client, will ensure consumers can access affordable financial advice," Bloch said.

Bloch also slammed the AFA's claims that the FPA did not represent the interests of its members.

"The position adopted by the AFA is nothing more than an attempt to recruit FPA members and runs counter to the best interests of planners, clients and the wider community," Bloch said.

"It is a shame the AFA is trying to split the industry during a consultation period, through misleading statements designed to instil fear."