Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

Macquarie, BT Wrap most expensive: survey

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

A customised survey of a select group of wraps, discount brokers and online platforms compared the cost of fees, minimum investments and platform administration.

Macquarie and BT were the most expensive wraps in terms of total cost to the investor over a five-year period, according to research from Investment Trends undertaken on behalf of RaboPlus.

The customised research compared platform fees on a $50,000 investment in 10 common investment funds over a one- to five-year period, as well as a blended model portfolio over a five-year period.

"We compared fees over a five-year time horizon because fund managers across most asset classes believe that investors should consider investing in these managed funds long term," Investment Trends researcher Andrew Knox said.

A select group of wraps including Colonial First Choice Wholesale, BT Wrap and Macquarie Wrap were included in the customised survey as well as discount brokers.

 
 

The research is the first of its kind and compares wraps, which are usually only accessible by financial planners, brokers and online platforms designed for direct brokers, according to RaboPlus.

The Macquarie and BT platforms were the most expensive based on an initial investment of $50,000.

Colonial First Choice Wholesale was not included in the comparison as only two common funds were represented on the platform.

"The BT and Macquarie wraps are only available through financial advisers. The fees, therefore, took into account a planner fee in addition to the administration fee," Knox said.

At the end of year five, RaboPlus charged the lowest fees for six out of the ten common managed funds.

Minimum investments to wholesale managed funds, platform administration, online tools and investor education were also compared in the survey.

RaboPlus also offered investors the lowest minimum investment into wholesale funds at $250 compared to all the other platforms.

E*Trade was the second lowest at $1000 and CommSec ranged from $1000 to $20,000. BT and Macquarie Wrap had the highest minimum investments at $50,000.

The research also showed RaboPlus and E*Trade were stronger in transaction and administration services, with Colonial First Choice Wholesale having the fastest application transaction times.