Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

Westpoint investors win indemnity insurance case

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

A Court of Appeal decision allows investors in the failed mezzanine finance scheme to recover costs through professional indemnity insurance.

The NSW Supreme Court of Appeal will allow Westpoint investors to recover their losses through professional indemnity insurance following a court battle against QBE Australia.

Investors took out the insurance by financial planning firm Quantum Securities with QBE Australia.

In March 2007, legal firm Slater & Gordon launched a class action against Quantum on behalf of the firm's 59 clients who lost $6.9 million through investments in Westpoint.

In court, QBE claimed that Quantum's professional indemnity insurance could not be used to cover the allegedly inappropriate advice given by Quantum's financial planner Andy Chen.

 
 

The NSW Court of Appeal, however, found that Westpoint investors could rely on the insurance to cover the losses of Quantum's Westpoint clients if the class action is successful.

The decision means Westpoint investors who relied on advice from Quantum to invest in the failed property group will continue their class action against Quantum, according to Slater & Gordon associate Ben Whitwell.

"It means the Quantum class action can continue and, if successful, investors could be able to recover their money through the insurance policy," he Whitwell

"This is yet another hurdle that Quantum clients have been forced to jump over as they try to recover some of the money they lost as a result of receiving inappropriate advice."

The investors involved in the class action are predominately from the Chinese community.

Quantum changed its name to Minox Securities after the court action began.