lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
07 November 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Macquarie profit rises amid stronger asset management results

Macquarie Group has posted a modest profit rise for the first half, supported by stronger earnings across its asset management and banking divisions
icon

ESG investing proves resilient amid global uncertainty

Despite global ESG adoption dipping slightly from record highs, Asia Pacific investors remain deeply committed to ...

icon

Cboe licence attractive to potential buyers: ASIC

Cboe’s recent success in acquiring a market operation license will make the exchange more attractive to incoming buyers, ...

icon

NAB profit steady as margins tighten and costs rise

The major bank has posted a stable full-year profit as margin pressures and remediation costs offset strong lending and ...

icon

LGT heralds Aussie fixed income 'renaissance'

Despite the RBA’s cash rate hold, the domestic bond market is in good shape compared to its international counterparts, ...

icon

Stonepeak to launch ASX infrastructure debt note

Global alternative investment firm Stonepeak is breaking into Australia with the launch of an ASX-listed infrastructure ...

VIEW ALL

FPA to review Basis Capital decision

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The association will be working with FOS regarding its ruling on an adviser who failed to provide adequate advice on a failed Basis Capital fund.

The FPA will be reviewing a decision made by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) which found that a planner had breached his duty of care regarding advice made on the failed Basis Capital Yield Fund. 

"The FPA will review this particular case closely because it appears that FOS is of the view that the use of risk profiling and research in this situation was inappropriate in terms of the law," FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said in a statement to InvestorDaily.

FOS questioned the adequacy of the planner's research, finding that the planner "relied a great deal on research reports" and did not make "sufficient enquiries into the true nature of the Basis Yield Fund".

FOS found the planner had breached his duty of care and obligations under the Corporations Act 2001, directing him to pay $103,382 to his client together with interest of 5 per cent per annum compounded from 15 November 2007 to the date of payment.

 
 

FPA will be working with FOS to review the case further.

"We need to understand the implications of this ruling and ensure members are made aware of them. We will be discussing this further with FOS," Bloch said.