Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

FPA to review Basis Capital decision

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The association will be working with FOS regarding its ruling on an adviser who failed to provide adequate advice on a failed Basis Capital fund.

The FPA will be reviewing a decision made by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) which found that a planner had breached his duty of care regarding advice made on the failed Basis Capital Yield Fund. 

"The FPA will review this particular case closely because it appears that FOS is of the view that the use of risk profiling and research in this situation was inappropriate in terms of the law," FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said in a statement to InvestorDaily.

FOS questioned the adequacy of the planner's research, finding that the planner "relied a great deal on research reports" and did not make "sufficient enquiries into the true nature of the Basis Yield Fund".

FOS found the planner had breached his duty of care and obligations under the Corporations Act 2001, directing him to pay $103,382 to his client together with interest of 5 per cent per annum compounded from 15 November 2007 to the date of payment.

 
 

FPA will be working with FOS to review the case further.

"We need to understand the implications of this ruling and ensure members are made aware of them. We will be discussing this further with FOS," Bloch said.