Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

FPA to review Basis Capital decision

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The association will be working with FOS regarding its ruling on an adviser who failed to provide adequate advice on a failed Basis Capital fund.

The FPA will be reviewing a decision made by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) which found that a planner had breached his duty of care regarding advice made on the failed Basis Capital Yield Fund. 

"The FPA will review this particular case closely because it appears that FOS is of the view that the use of risk profiling and research in this situation was inappropriate in terms of the law," FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said in a statement to InvestorDaily.

FOS questioned the adequacy of the planner's research, finding that the planner "relied a great deal on research reports" and did not make "sufficient enquiries into the true nature of the Basis Yield Fund".

FOS found the planner had breached his duty of care and obligations under the Corporations Act 2001, directing him to pay $103,382 to his client together with interest of 5 per cent per annum compounded from 15 November 2007 to the date of payment.

 
 

FPA will be working with FOS to review the case further.

"We need to understand the implications of this ruling and ensure members are made aware of them. We will be discussing this further with FOS," Bloch said.