Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

IFSA warns on Henry annuity option

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

The Henry review's proposed government annuity scheme will disadvantage the poor and could even breach the Australian constitution, warns IFSA.

A mandated government annuities system will punish low-income earners, according to the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA).

According to IFSA, in its interim report, the Henry review examined the possibility of a compulsory government annuities scheme.

Research commissioned for IFSA, however, showed that such a scheme would favour wealthier people at the expense of lower income earners, IFSA chief executive John Brogden said.

"Such a scheme would be manifestly unfair and result in lower paid workers subsidising wealthier Australians," Brogden said.

 
 

"According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, manual labourers do not live as long as office workers. A government-run annuities scheme, by its nature, rewards those who live longer at the expense of those who have a shorter life."

He said a government scheme would also discourage people from voluntarily adding to their retirement savings because of the "harsh restrictions imposed on how savings can be accessed in retirement".

A mandated scheme may also deny people the choice of wanting an annuity product.

Brodgen also said the scheme "forces people to fund a scheme that may not be on just terms and could be in breach of the Australian constitution".

Brogden said people should have the right to choose how to manage their retirement savings.