Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

SMSF trustee imprisoned

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

An illegal early-release superannuation scheme lands a SMSF trustee in jail.

A trustee of a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) has been sentenced to 12 months jail following ASIC charges regarding an early release superannuation scheme.

ASIC had brought charges against Susan Palusi for illegally facilitating the release of superannuation benefits totalling just over $260,000.

She was a trustee of the Palusi Superannuation Fund (PSF) at the time and dishonestly arranged nine people in the fund to get early access to their superannuation benefits, which were subsequently rolled into the PSF.

Palusi gave the money to a number of people while retaining around $73,000 by way of a commission.

 
 

According to ASIC, Palusi was aware of her legal obligations including the need to preserve superannuation benefits.

She was convicted under sections 62 and 202 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (1993).

Under this Act, the sole purpose test requires SMSF trustees to maintain these funds for the purpose of providing retirement benefits to members.

Palusi was sentenced in the District Court of New South Wales.