Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
11 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

No bear market in sight for Aussie shares but banks face rotation risk

Australian equities are defying expectations, with resilient earnings, policy support and a shift away from bank dominance fuelling confidence that ...
icon

US funds drive steep outflows at GQG Partners

Outflows of US$1.4 billion from its US equity funds have contributed to GQG Partners reporting its highest monthly ...

icon

Super funds’ hedge moves point to early upside risk for AUD

Australian superannuation funds have slightly lifted their hedge ratios on international equities, reversing a ...

icon

Australia’s super giant goes big on impact: $2bn and counting

Australia’s second largest super fund is prioritising impact investing with a $2 billion commitment, targeting assets ...

icon

Over half of Australian funds have closed in 15 years, A-REITs hit hardest

Over half of Australian investment funds available 15 years ago have either merged or closed, with Australian equity ...

icon

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns ...

VIEW ALL

Fees not high for hedge fund managers

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
5 minute read

Zenith's first review of the hedge fund sector has found managers are charging less for alpha than other benchmark-aware funds.

Fees charged by hedge fund managers are lower than those charged by benchmark-aware managers, according to a review by research firm Zenith Investment Partners.

"While it is true hedge funds do charge higher fees, they are in fact not higher than those charged by benchmark-aware managers on the active portion of their portfolios," Zenith Investment Partners director David Smythe said.

There was a compelling argument that suggested hedge fund managers were charging less for alpha than benchmark-aware funds, Smythe said.

"Zenith contends that the focus on fees in the benchmark-aware space is therefore warranted. But we also note that any discussion on fees should be undertaken with reference to alpha, not just the headline fee rate," he said.

 
 

Ibbotson head of alternative investments Michael Coop said the Australian institutional investor market was the toughest in the world when negotiating fees for alternative investments.

Coop said it was important, however, for investors to consider three key factors when reviewing fees.

He said investors needed to question whether they were receiving their fair share of return and value added by the manager.

"When reviewing fees, investors also need to ask themselves how much is the strategy worth paying for, how high are returns for the risk, how consistent is the performance and is the manager effective at protecting the portfolio from large losses comparable," he said.

Another factor investors needed to consider was how much it cost to create and implement the investment strategy successfully, he said.

The Zenith review, led by the recently appointed head of alternatives Daniel Liptak, also found market-neutral funds managed to perform strongly in line with the All Ordinaries Index.

"Australian market-neutral funds have over the last five years captured all the upside of the Australian All Ordinaries, but importantly did not participate in the downside," Liptak said.

The market-neutral funds in the Zenith review delivered a cumulative return of 105 per cent, net of fees, since July 2005.

Over the same period, the All Ordinaries Equity Index returned 2.24 per cent (gross of fees) to investors.

The current review focuses on market-neutral funds and is the first of a number of Zenith reviews on the hedge fund sector.