Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

SMSF auditors must go to the source

  •  
By Karin Derkley
  •  
2 minute read

The standard reports provided by platforms may not be sufficient for the audit process of SMSFs.

Auditors of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) cannot rely purely on the normal reporting of platforms and must obtain more reliable independent evidence with which to produce their auditor's report, according to the principal of a chartered accounting firm.

Intermediaries such as advisers often access reports from the wrap account and brand it, with the information then used by the accountant to produce financial statements for the fund.

But auditors need to obtain independent evidence, preferably directly from the source, Sharyn Long Chartered Accountants principal Sharyn Long said.

"My concern is that auditors don't understand their obligations and responsibility when an intermediary is involved," she said. "Any report needs to come directly from the wrap provider, rather than from information provided by the adviser."

Advisers and accountants may become frustrated by auditors requesting original reports from wrap providers, Long said.

"Accountants who have already obtained reports to produce a financial statement might wonder why the auditor still wants access to the original reports. But our job is to acquire evidence from as independent a source as possible."

Auditors who rely purely on evidence provided by an intermediary may not be fulfilling the requirements of Australian Auditing Standards ASA500, 505 and 402 that require them to "obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, request external confirmation and consider the activities of a service organisation (such as a wrap account)", Long pointed out.

While wrap providers adhere to robust systems and controls and are required to have these audited it only provides "a certain level of comfort", Long said, and auditors still need to conduct additional tests and procedures on that evidence to ensure that any anomalies or inconsistencies can be identified.

The adviser could play a role in this process by helping to facilitate the efficient delivery of reports directly from the wrap provider to the auditor, Long said.

"The more efficient and simpler the process of obtaining that information the more economical the audit will be for the SMSF," she said.