Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

SMSF auditors must go to the source

  •  
By Karin Derkley
  •  
2 minute read

The standard reports provided by platforms may not be sufficient for the audit process of SMSFs.

Auditors of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) cannot rely purely on the normal reporting of platforms and must obtain more reliable independent evidence with which to produce their auditor's report, according to the principal of a chartered accounting firm.

Intermediaries such as advisers often access reports from the wrap account and brand it, with the information then used by the accountant to produce financial statements for the fund.

But auditors need to obtain independent evidence, preferably directly from the source, Sharyn Long Chartered Accountants principal Sharyn Long said.

"My concern is that auditors don't understand their obligations and responsibility when an intermediary is involved," she said. "Any report needs to come directly from the wrap provider, rather than from information provided by the adviser."

Advisers and accountants may become frustrated by auditors requesting original reports from wrap providers, Long said.

"Accountants who have already obtained reports to produce a financial statement might wonder why the auditor still wants access to the original reports. But our job is to acquire evidence from as independent a source as possible."

Auditors who rely purely on evidence provided by an intermediary may not be fulfilling the requirements of Australian Auditing Standards ASA500, 505 and 402 that require them to "obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, request external confirmation and consider the activities of a service organisation (such as a wrap account)", Long pointed out.

While wrap providers adhere to robust systems and controls and are required to have these audited it only provides "a certain level of comfort", Long said, and auditors still need to conduct additional tests and procedures on that evidence to ensure that any anomalies or inconsistencies can be identified.

The adviser could play a role in this process by helping to facilitate the efficient delivery of reports directly from the wrap provider to the auditor, Long said.

"The more efficient and simpler the process of obtaining that information the more economical the audit will be for the SMSF," she said.