Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
11 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

No bear market in sight for Aussie shares but banks face rotation risk

Australian equities are defying expectations, with resilient earnings, policy support and a shift away from bank dominance fuelling confidence that ...
icon

US funds drive steep outflows at GQG Partners

Outflows of US$1.4 billion from its US equity funds have contributed to GQG Partners reporting its highest monthly ...

icon

Super funds’ hedge moves point to early upside risk for AUD

Australian superannuation funds have slightly lifted their hedge ratios on international equities, reversing a ...

icon

Australia’s super giant goes big on impact: $2bn and counting

Australia’s second largest super fund is prioritising impact investing with a $2 billion commitment, targeting assets ...

icon

Over half of Australian funds have closed in 15 years, A-REITs hit hardest

Over half of Australian investment funds available 15 years ago have either merged or closed, with Australian equity ...

icon

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns ...

VIEW ALL

Better transparency of SWFs needed

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

Sovereign wealth funds are rapidly accumulating assets, increasing the demand for better transparency.

Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) are growing rapidly in size, but knowledge about these funds is often limited, a report by State Street has found.

SWFs currently hold US$3 trillion in total assets and this figure is expected to grow to US$7 trillion by 2012. As they grow in size, so does their influence on financial markets.

"If SWFs... allocate some 60 per cent of their assets to equities, there is scope for the global equity risk premium to fall and for real bond yields to rise," the report found.

The demand for equity of these funds could also cause an increase in global equity prices.

 
 

The funds are in a position to influence key corporate decisions, such as on takeovers and the selection of management, through the stakes they hold in corporations.

Traditionally, SWFs have stayed out of the limelight and it has not always been clear how these funds are structured, or how they manage their assets.

Questions have also been raised whether governments should own large stakes in private companies in the first place.

But as the funds are sovereign it is difficult to force them to open up.

"The only way to advance the debate on transparency and involvement is by consensus and dialogue, not political posturing," the report said.