Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

Short-selling ban cost hundreds of millions

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

The short-selling ban has cost the financial services industry more than $300 million, according to a fund manager.

The cost associated with the short-selling ban is likely to be more than $300 million, according to fund manager Plato Investment Management.

The restrictions reduced trading volumes and led to higher transaction costs, Plato Investment Management managing director Don Hamson said in a report that was sent to ASIC and Treasury before the ban was lifted on 25 May.

Reduced trading volumes resulted in fewer commissions for brokers, while an increase in bid/ask spreads led to higher transaction costs, he said.

Based on a brokerage commission of 10 basis points and an increase in spreads by 8 basis points, the ban would have resulted in $1 billion in missed revenues on an annualised basis.

 
 

"You can always argue that the brokerage commission should be higher or lower, but I think it is a reasonable estimate," Hamson told InvestorDaily.

But the short-selling ban was only fully in place for two months, not 12 months, while financial securities could not be sold short for another six months.

Assuming financials take up around 30 per cent of the market, the cost of the ban over the period it was in place amounted to $315 million.

Hamson said the real cost of the ban is likely to be higher because his calculations do not take into account the effect it had on the economy.

"The economic cost of banning short selling is likely to have further fuelled the already deteriorating economic and financial environment," he said.

Plato manages several funds that use short-selling strategies.