Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

Fee-for-service could spark ETF boom

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

A move to fee-for-service advice would drive ETF growth in Australia, State Street says.

The transition of the financial planning industry from commissions to fee-for-service could spark a rapid growth of the exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in Australia, according to State Street Global Advisors.

When financial planners in the United States moved to a fee-for-service model in 2001, a similar development took place.

"That transition from a commission, product standpoint to a fee-for-service, wrap fee-type program was probably the single largest trend to help grow ETFs in the US," State Street senior managing director James Ross said.

"When I look at where the US was then and where Australia is today, I see significant parallels," he said.

 
 

Ross saw further parallels in the investment climate during which these changes took place.

In the US the growth of the sector was helped by the bursting of the internet bubble, which sparked discussions about the height of managed fund fees.

In Australia, a similar discussion was started after the global financial crisis set in.

Ross is a veteran of the ETF industry and was involved in the development of the first ETF to see the light of day in the US, the Standard and Poor's Deposit Receipt (SPDR), in 1992.

This ETF gave investors the ability to track the S&P 500 and it is the most liquid equity in the market today.

Ross has seen the industry grow from nil to US$740 billion in assets under management (AUM) as at the end of last year.

"The range of ETFs in the US expanded rapidly - maybe too rapidly because there is a significant amount of product that doesn't have critical mass," he said. "I think a third of the US ETFs have less than $50 million in them."
 
"From the Australian standpoint, there is certainly room for expansion but you want to do it in a very pragmatic way."

Ross did not want to say what type of new ETFs State Street is looking to add to its range in Australia.

But an obvious gap in the market is a fixed income ETF. Ross said these types of ETFs were very successful in the US last year.

"Fixed income ETFs in the US last year had a banner year - their AUM was up almost 80 per cent," Ross said.