Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
16 July 2025 by Miranda Brownlee

Surge in profit optimism drives bullish global sentiment, BofA survey finds

Global investor sentiment is becoming “toppy” but overweight positions on equities are yet to reach extreme levels, according to a recent Bank of ...
icon

Australian AI Awards returns for 2025

Submissions and nominations are now open for the Australian AI Awards 2025 – submit now to be recognised for excellence

icon

CBA flags super and tax reform as critical pillar for productivity growth

Implementing changes to superannuation concessions and adjusting Australia’s tax settings will be an important part of ...

icon

Client losses, psychic advice and a $192m trade: BBY chairman lands in court

The former chairman of failed stockbroking firm BBY has appeared in court charged with dishonest conduct offences a ...

icon

Record ETF flows power BlackRock’s iShares growth in first half of 2025

BlackRock’s iShares ETFs have reported a record first half for inflows, gaining US$192 billion in the past six months

icon

HUB24 solidifies position as market leader with record net inflows

Record net inflows of $19.8 billion over the financial year has further strengthened HUB24’s position in the platform ...

VIEW ALL

Volume rebates keep platforms expensive

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Volume rebates have delayed innovation in the platform industry and kept these systems artificially expensive, industry participants say.

Investment platforms, such as master trusts and wraps, are too expensive and volume rebates are largely to blame for the lack of low-cost options in Australia, according to industry participants.

"If we cut out various revenue sources from the industry then many businesses will fail - that is being said. But what I'm saying is that those revenue sources were artificial and have masked the need for change," Paragem managing director Ian Knox said.

"The platform industry huffs and puffs and still hasn't brought to the market a low-cost offering relative to other countries, like America," Knox said.

"The industry has created the need for the regulator to step in."

 
 

Treasury is currently in discussions with platform providers and stakeholders about the proposed ban on volume rebates paid by platforms to adviser dealer groups.
 
Opponents of the ban on rebates said the system had been incorrectly lumped in with the government's fee and commission crackdown.

But dealer group Snowball Group agreed that platforms were too expensive and that benefits of scale would be better passed on to consumers.

"Our view is simple - the cost of platforms and fund management needs to come down. The efficiency dividend has to flow through to the consumer more than it has in the past," Snowball managing director Tony McDonald said.

Although he sees limited circumstances where rebates could exist while still passing on scale benefits and without "polluting" advice, he said dealer groups should take the reins in their own hands.

"I would rather see advice businesses step up and take control of the efficiency dividend. That ultimately means having to have a hard look at becoming the responsible entity (RE) and trustee," he said.

"We already have an RE and we will have a hard look at becoming a trustee," McDonald said.

This would not mean dealer groups have to cut their relationship with platforms, he said. They can become the owner of an administration system, but still outsource the development and maintenance.

"In a legal sense, it means having a private label rather than a badge," McDonald said.