Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

ASIC seeks to wind up possible Ponzi scheme

  •  
By
  •  
2 minute read

ASIC has appointed a liquidator to wind up 13 companies involved in a possible Ponzi scheme.

ASIC has obtained orders to wind up 13 companies that have been associated with the possible operation of a Ponzi-style scheme and has appointed Simon Wallace-Smith of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu as liquidator.

Wallace-Smith will be required to identify, collect and secure the assets of the companies for the benefit of investors and creditors.

The companies are associated with Peter van de Steeg, Jonathan Ezzy and Peter Berlowitz of Victoria and Scott Walker of Western Australia.

The scheme has affected more than 100 investors who have contributed in excess of $16 million.

 
 

In April this year ASIC sought to freeze the companies' assets, which were then still estimated at $14.6 million.

ASIC said it was concerned the defendants may have been providing or involved in conducting a financial services business without the necessary Australian financial services licence and without providing the required adequate disclosure to investors.

The regulator was also concerned investors may have been misled about the nature of the arrangements they were entering into and that the defendants may have breached various provisions of the Corporations Act.

ASIC continues to investigate the activities of the defendants.