Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
16 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Investors flock to bank credit ETF as hybrid phase-out accelerates

Demand for diversified credit exposure is rising fast, with advisers and income-focused investors funnelling money into a new exchange-traded fund ...
icon

Rest stays committed to equities despite global volatility concerns

Rest Super remains “fully committed” to equities, even as it anticipates higher market volatility than experienced in ...

icon

Surge in profit optimism drives bullish global sentiment, BofA survey finds

Global investor sentiment is becoming “toppy” but overweight positions on equities are yet to reach extreme levels, ...

icon

Australian AI Awards returns for 2025

Submissions and nominations are now open for the Australian AI Awards 2025 – submit now to be recognised for excellence

icon

CBA flags super and tax reform as critical pillar for productivity growth

Implementing changes to superannuation concessions and adjusting Australia’s tax settings will be an important part of ...

icon

Client losses, psychic advice and a $192m trade: BBY chairman lands in court

The former chairman of failed stockbroking firm BBY has appeared in court charged with dishonest conduct offences a ...

VIEW ALL

ASIC seeks to wind up possible Ponzi scheme

  •  
By
  •  
2 minute read

ASIC has appointed a liquidator to wind up 13 companies involved in a possible Ponzi scheme.

ASIC has obtained orders to wind up 13 companies that have been associated with the possible operation of a Ponzi-style scheme and has appointed Simon Wallace-Smith of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu as liquidator.

Wallace-Smith will be required to identify, collect and secure the assets of the companies for the benefit of investors and creditors.

The companies are associated with Peter van de Steeg, Jonathan Ezzy and Peter Berlowitz of Victoria and Scott Walker of Western Australia.

The scheme has affected more than 100 investors who have contributed in excess of $16 million.

 
 

In April this year ASIC sought to freeze the companies' assets, which were then still estimated at $14.6 million.

ASIC said it was concerned the defendants may have been providing or involved in conducting a financial services business without the necessary Australian financial services licence and without providing the required adequate disclosure to investors.

The regulator was also concerned investors may have been misled about the nature of the arrangements they were entering into and that the defendants may have breached various provisions of the Corporations Act.

ASIC continues to investigate the activities of the defendants.