Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
12 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

When perception holds the power

Money, markets, even central banks – what really gives them power isn’t substance, it’s belief. Op-Ed That lesson plays out vividly in the Spanish ...
icon

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential

icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

VIEW ALL

Hostplus CIO calls for liquidity window

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Super funds should be allowed periods of lower liquidity levels to make better long-term investments, according to the Hostplus CIO.

Superannuation funds should be able to make use of a liquidity window to bridge short-term increases in illiquid holdings in order to make better investment decisions, according to Hostplus chief investment officer Sam Sicilia.

"It seems to me that superannuation funds are unnecessarily hamstrung in their ability to take on additional levels of illiquidity, especially given the fact that superannuation money is locked within in the superannuation system - members cannot take their money," Sicilia said yesterday at the annual Australian Super Investment Conference on the Gold Coast.

Sicilia argued that if super funds were to participate in attractive investment opportunities, such as Australian infrastructure projects and the expected offloading of assets by European governments, they should be allowed to increase their exposure to illiquid assets.

"The availability of a liquidity window would enable superannuation funds to invest over much longer time horizons," he said.
 
But super funds are restricted in their ability to offset illiquid holdings, partly because they need to hold cash to offset member investment choice liabilities.

 
 

"Conceptually, [a liquidity window] should permit member choice options, not just to be backed by cash, but also by future compulsory superannuation contributions, by rental income that comes from your direct property portfolio, by distribution income that comes from your infrastructure assets," he said.

"I can see absolutely no reason why we have to hold cash for member investment choice options. What we need to do is find mechanisms to transfer the value of the member's holdings in one option to another or between funds. It need not be cash, and a liquidity window would help offset that.

"I urge super funds to lobby for a liquidity window," he said.

But Australian Prudential Regulation Authority senior manager Kevin Dent, who also spoke at the conference, said there was no quick fix to liquidity issues and stressed the importance of scenario testing by funds.

"This is not an issue that you solve on a permanent basis. Funds need to constantly monitor their requirements," he said.