Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
21 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Chalmers calls out ‘policy-induced’ economic shock tied to Trump

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has explicitly described the disruptive global economic fallout from Donald Trump’s trade and fiscal stance as a ...
icon

Fund manager declares Australia investing safe haven as ASX gains

Amid global uncertainty and erratic policy swings out of the US, a boutique manager says Australia is emerging as a ...

icon

Spender pushes for review into YFYS, RG 97 to address ‘suboptimal outcomes’

The Your Future Your Super scheme and RG 97 may be directing capital away from more productive uses and discouraging ...

icon

Gold faces balancing act in H2 amid inflation, geopolitics

Gold’s path forward remains highly dependent on multiple factors following an exceptionally strong start to the year

icon

Australia’s economy to remain resilient despite looming tariff deadline

Renewed trade tensions have raised fresh questions about the outlook for the Australian economy as the August deadline ...

icon

Smaller super players stand out on top 10 ranking

SuperRatings has shared the top 10 balanced options of the last financial year. The Raiz Super Moderately Aggressive ...

VIEW ALL

MySuper will not dictate fees: Cooper

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Jeremy Cooper has ended speculation about maximum fee levels for MySuper options.

Former Super System Review chair Jeremy Cooper has rejected the idea that a MySuper regime will set legal requirements around maximum fee levels for the default fund.

"There is absolutely no limitation whatsoever on two important things: investment strategies or fees," Cooper said at the Morningstar Investment Conference last week.

"There have been an awful lot of furphies floating around in the market around those two issues. There is absolutely nothing preventing a MySuper fund charging whatever it likes."

He also denied the government would push for funds to include more passive investment strategies.

 
 

"Similarly, the government would be brain dead if it tried to dictate to all the managers, with their consultants, what the strategy ought to be in the MySuper fund, so there is no dictum that it needs to be a passive investment. So those are total furphies," he said.

A number of small to mid-sized industry funds use only active fund managers in their investment options, and they feared they would have to change their strategy as a result of new legislation.

Asked if the MySuper regime would allow for 100 per cent active management, Cooper, who is currently Challenger retirement income chairman, said: "Legally, there is nothing that will prevent them from doing that, but they will just show up as a fund with high fees and [as a result] low returns."
 
As part of the Cooper review, Deloitte was asked to produce a series of estimates of the total costs of MySuper products for various sized funds.

The estimates show the total cost - including investment and operating costs, as well as costs associated with intra-fund advice - for an actively-managed balanced portfolio that includes alternative assets would be 89 basis points for a $5 billion super fund and about 77 basis points for a $10 billion fund.

Some industry participants have taken these calculations as a guideline to what the government will look for in issuing MySuper licences.

Suggestions have been made that First State Super's balanced fund, which charges an investment fee of 37 basis points for a person with an account balance of $50,000, was the model on which MySuper was built.

Cooper did not deny that was the case.

"First State Super is probably the most comfortable with MySuper," he said.