Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
21 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Chalmers calls out ‘policy-induced’ economic shock tied to Trump

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has explicitly described the disruptive global economic fallout from Donald Trump’s trade and fiscal stance as a ...
icon

Fund manager declares Australia investing safe haven as ASX gains

Amid global uncertainty and erratic policy swings out of the US, a boutique manager says Australia is emerging as a ...

icon

Spender pushes for review into YFYS, RG 97 to address ‘suboptimal outcomes’

The Your Future Your Super scheme and RG 97 may be directing capital away from more productive uses and discouraging ...

icon

Gold faces balancing act in H2 amid inflation, geopolitics

Gold’s path forward remains highly dependent on multiple factors following an exceptionally strong start to the year

icon

Australia’s economy to remain resilient despite looming tariff deadline

Renewed trade tensions have raised fresh questions about the outlook for the Australian economy as the August deadline ...

icon

Smaller super players stand out on top 10 ranking

SuperRatings has shared the top 10 balanced options of the last financial year. The Raiz Super Moderately Aggressive ...

VIEW ALL

Vanguard quantifies cost of regulatory action

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

Vanguard has estimated the margin squeeze of regulatory reform at 0.5-1 per cent.

Regulatory action, including the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) and the Strong Super System reforms, will reduce total margins across the financial services value chain by 50 to 100 basis points, according to Vanguard.

"There is the broad conversation about extracting costs out of this value chain, in the region of between 50 and 100 basis points. That will come out of one of four areas, largely the investment manager, platforms, dealer groups and the advice businesses themselves," Vanguard Investments senior investment analyst Paul Chin said.

Chin, who spoke at a Financial Services Institute of Australia seminar yesterday, said margins had come under pressure as financial planners had to review the value of their services, while investors were also more aware of costs.

"Whether it is FOFA or the Cooper review, if you think about any of those sorts of regulatory changes, there is a lot of discussion about trying to think about the relative simplicity, trying to think about the relative costs. There is real pressure on financial planners and thinking about their value propositions," he said.
 
"On the other side, we have got investors that have come out of the financial crisis who are sensitive to fees and are really well educated.

 
 

"APRA (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority) under the Cooper reforms has been nominated as essentially a depository for both after-tax reporting and fees, so this is going to be really interesting from the viewpoint that clients will come to the doorstop of financial planners, where they are able to compare the cost of financial planners versus a plain vanilla limited advice industry fund. That is going to have a real effect on margins."