Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
09 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s governance and lending weight to ...
icon

Silver’s record performance riding ‘dual tailwinds’, Global X says

Silver ETFs are drawing record inflows, fuelled by strong industrial demand, gold’s upward momentum, and global interest ...

icon

Conaghan says Labor has retreated from ‘flawed’ super tax

The shadow financial services minister has confirmed Labor’s retreat from the proposed $3 million super tax, describing ...

icon

Ausbil backs active edge with new dividend ETF

The Australian fund manager Ausbil has launched an active ETF designed to provide investors with resilient income, ...

icon

Combet hails $27bn gain as portfolio shifts pay off

The Future Fund has posted a $27.4 billion increase in value to $252.3 billion, driven by strong equity markets, ...

icon

Global funds outperform as Australian equities lag benchmarks

Active fund managers in Australia face mixed fortunes as global equities and real estate outperform but domestic ...

VIEW ALL

Opposition should outline its super plans: AIST

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

AIST calls for the coalition to outline its plans for tackling Australia's pension problems.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has challenged the coalition to outline its plans for tackling the funding challenges of Australia's ageing population.

The association, which represents the not-for-profit super sector, said the coalition needed to come up with an alternative policy after rejecting the government's proposal to increase the superannuation guarantee from 9 to 12 per cent.

"It's not good enough for the coalition to simply quote selected comments from the Henry Tax Review, when Dr Henry himself warned that the review should be considered in its entirety," AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said.

"If the coalition really believes compulsory super should stay at the current 9 per cent level then it needs to explain how it plans to ensure the average Australian worker will be able to retire with dignity and how future generations of taxpayers will be able to fund the needs of our rapidly ageing population," Reynolds said.

 
 

"If the coalition has the solution to these demographic challenges, then let's hear it," she said.

The vast majority of taxpayers would have less super and experience a drop in take-home pay under the Henry Review recommendations compared to the government's super reform package, which included a super rebate for low-income earners, Reynolds said.

AIST was also opposed to the Henry recommendations because of the need for complex data matching requirements.

"Raising the superannuation levy is about creating a sustainable retirement incomes system that will meet the demographic challenges facing Australia" she said.