Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
05 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

APRA funds, party dissent behind Labor’s alleged Div 296 pause

APRA-regulated funds have reportedly raised concerns with the government over Division 296, as news of potential policy tweaks makes headlines
icon

Fed credibility erosion may propel gold above US$5k/oz, Goldman Sachs says

Goldman Sachs has warned threats to the Fed’s independence could lift gold above forecasts, shattering previous records

icon

Market pundits divided on availability of ‘reliable diversifiers’

While some believe reliable diversifiers are becoming increasingly rare, others disagree – citing several assets that ...

icon

AMP eyes portable alpha expansion as strategy makes quiet comeback

Portable alpha, long considered complex and costly, is experiencing a quiet resurgence as investors navigate ...

icon

Ten Cap remains bullish on equities as RBA eases policy

The investment management firm’s latest monthly update has cited rate cuts, labour strength and China’s recovery as key ...

icon

Super funds can handle tax tweaks, but not political meddling

The CEO of one of Australia’s largest super funds says his outfit has become an expert at rolling with regulatory ...

VIEW ALL

Super funds struggle to meet long-term targets

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

Super fund targets need to account for changing economic landscape, SuperRatings says.

Superannuation funds are not meeting their long-term, consumer price index (CPI) plus objectives, research by SuperRatings has shown.

"CPI-plus objectives are probably more important now than ever before, given funds are struggling to meet their long-term objectives."

For funds that do articulate their CPI-plus objective, which is only 40 per cent of the market, the current picture doesn't look good, SuperRatings said.

"No balanced funds, where approximately 70 to 80 per cent of Australians have their retirement savings parked, [are] meeting their objective over three and five years, and very few meeting them over seven or 10-year periods," the firm said.

 
 

Partly this is the result of the fact that very few funds have altered their objectives in the last 15 years, despite the dramatic changes in the economic landscape, SuperRatings said.

"While performance targets in some cases of 5 per cent or more above CPI over five-year periods may have been appropriate during the heady days of the bull market prior to the GFC, the fact is that we are in a new paradigm."

"We have entered a lower return environment, with some calling it the 'new normal'."

The research firm said there was a greater focus on delivering 'consistent' returns rather than aiming for maximum performance.

"As such, funds need to reassess their objectives and question their assumptions about expected returns and their appropriateness over different timeframes," SuperRatings said.

The median balanced fund, defined as funds with between 60 and 76 per cent exposure to growth assets, fell 1.9 per cent in the 2011 calendar year, but the disparity between the best and worst performers was large.

The best performing balanced fund gained 3.3 per cent, while the worst performer lost 5.5 per cent.

"This result could have been worse if we consider the continued barrage of negative economic news, falling equity markets, a worsening European debt crisis and geopolitical events throughout the year."