Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
02 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

UN report links global wealth managers to financing occupation and conflict

A new report claims major wealth managers have funnelled “critical funding” to both state and corporate actors supporting the Israeli military action ...
icon

Is passive investing really driving CBA’s rally?

Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s (CBA) recent surge in share price has sparked debate on whether passive investing, ...

icon

Diversified portfolio helps Aware Super deliver almost 12% return

The super fund’s Future Saver High Growth option delivered an 11.9 per cent return for FY2024–25, on the back of a ...

icon

State Street leaves asset allocations unchanged

State Street Investment Management has opted to maintain the existing asset allocation across its ETF model portfolios ...

icon

Disciplined rotations, bitcoin and property buys drive AMP’s double-digit super returns

AMP has delivered another year of double-digit gains across its flagship superannuation options, with its MySuper ...

icon

Equity markets reward HESTA as MySuper option tops 10% return

HESTA has delivered a 10.18 per cent return for its MySuper Balanced Growth option in FY2024–25, marking the third ...

VIEW ALL

FOFA delays post-retirement development

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

Regulatory reform detracts from post-retirement product development, former Asgard head says.

The implementation costs of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms come at the expense of product development, in particularly post-retirement products, according to consultant and former head of Asgard Wayne Wilson.

"I don't think we have the right products for retirees; we certainly don't have the right investment strategies for retirees," the Hunts' Group senior consultant told InvestorDaily.

"We don't seem to have the right balance between protecting their assets so that they last and providing enough growth in them so that they don't run down so fast."

Wilson said many retirees were too exposed to equities during the global financial crisis (GFC), which saw their investments drop significantly when prices started to plunge.

"There is the thought of somebody who just retired during the middle of the GFC to see their retirement go down by 30 or 40 per cent overnight," Wilson said.

"They spent 30 years building it; a few nasty days on the stock market and 40 per cent of it goes out the door and it hasn't come back.

"Those people find themselves stuck drawing down from a pile that is 60 per cent of what they thought they were drawing down from. And they can't stop for two or three years until the market comes good."

Wealth management companies are keen to develop better post-retirement products, but the current wave of regulatory change makes it hard for companies to allocate budgets to these projects, Wilson said.

"There is time and development that they like to do on products, but they can't spend money on that if they have to spend money on FOFA," he said.

Wilson said wealth management companies are keen to take a closer look at portfolio protection strategies.

"There is a lot more thinking about that but they haven't found a cost-effective way of doing it," he said.

"The solutions I've seen just take too much off performance and they just take you back to a rate that is not that much different from taking a term deposit or a 10 year bond or something."

Wilson argued that to make the products viable, providers needed to get the fees under 100 basis points.

"I haven't seen that yet," he said.