Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
05 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

APRA funds, party dissent behind Labor’s alleged Div 296 pause

APRA-regulated funds have reportedly raised concerns with the government over Division 296, as news of potential policy tweaks makes headlines
icon

Fed credibility erosion may propel gold above US$5k/oz, Goldman Sachs says

Goldman Sachs has warned threats to the Fed’s independence could lift gold above forecasts, shattering previous records

icon

Market pundits divided on availability of ‘reliable diversifiers’

While some believe reliable diversifiers are becoming increasingly rare, others disagree – citing several assets that ...

icon

AMP eyes portable alpha expansion as strategy makes quiet comeback

Portable alpha, long considered complex and costly, is experiencing a quiet resurgence as investors navigate ...

icon

Ten Cap remains bullish on equities as RBA eases policy

The investment management firm’s latest monthly update has cited rate cuts, labour strength and China’s recovery as key ...

icon

Super funds can handle tax tweaks, but not political meddling

The CEO of one of Australia’s largest super funds says his outfit has become an expert at rolling with regulatory ...

VIEW ALL

FSS' privacy breach response endorsed

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

First State Super and Pillar responded appropriately to security breach, privacy commissioner says.

First State Super (FSS) responded appropriately to a breach of its data security last year, a report by privacy commissioner Timothy Pilgrim found.

The commissioner concluded that the fund and its administrator Pillar had breached National Privacy Principle 4.1, which states that an organisation must take reasonable steps to protect the personal information it holds from misuse and loss and from unauthorised access, modification or disclosure.

But the commissioner also said the organisations had taken appropriate measures once they became aware of the problem.

"The commissioner acknowledges that upon becoming aware of this matter, FSS's administrative manager, Pillar and FSS itself acted immediately to contain the incident, commenced an internal investigation of the incident, reviewed data security practices and sought external advice on how to handle the situation," Pilgrim said.

"Consequently, the commissioner ceased his own motion investigation into this matter, on the basis that the response to this incident appears adequate in the circumstances."

The commissioner has closed the case.

In September 2011, security specialist and OSI Security principal consultant Patrick Webster, and former FSS member, was able to access the details of 568 other members.

But the report published yesterday revealed that the super fund's security systems were successful in identifying an issue with its server before FSS was contacted by Webster.

"Specifically, Pillar's website monitoring system did detect an abnormality in its server logs on the morning of the incident," Pilgrim said.

Commenting on the report's findings, FSS chief executive Michael Dwyer said: "We acknowledge the commissioner's finding that our data security at the time was inadequate, but it is important to understand that at no time was there any opportunity for fraudulent transactions to occur."

But Dwyer also said the incident was not taken lightly by the fund.

"Clearly the breach was not insignificant," he said.

"We have apologised to our members and they can have every confidence that their personal information and their accounts are subject to stringent security protocols including regular ongoing security testing and reporting by highly regarded, independent specialist IT security consultants."