lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Mergers & Acquisitions
03 November 2025 by Georgie Preston

Cboe to exit Australia

Just weeks after receiving ASIC approval to operate as a listings market, the alternative exchange has announced its decision to sell the Australian ...
icon

Westpac NPAT declines to $6.9bn amid heated competition

The major bank has reported lower net profit after tax as competitive pressures and investment spending weigh on margins ...

icon

‘Yield is destiny’ as PGIM backs bond bull market

Bonds are in a rare, income-led bull market with Fed rate cuts likely to further extend the rally, according to the ...

icon

Chalmers pushes Australia as global capital magnet

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has pitched Australia as the world’s most compelling investment destination amid rising ...

icon

AustralianSuper shakes up executive team

Chief member officer, Rose Kerlin, has been promoted to deputy chief executive in an expanded capacity which will see ...

icon

Future Fund surpasses $200 billion milestone 

Investment returns for the Future Fund hit a milestone in September, adding $200 billion in value for the first time ...

VIEW ALL

Semi-active ETFs more viable than active ETFs

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Semi-active ETFs are more likely to find success on the ASX than truly active ETFs, Tria says.

It is unlikely many active exchange-traded funds (ETFs) will be listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) due to managers' concerns over portfolio disclosure.

Instead, fund managers could be attracted to ASX's new AQUA II platform, which allows the listing of units of managed trusts and can be used as a new distribution channel.

But we could see  more semi-active ETFs, including rules-based, quantitative and other customised ETFs, being listed on the ASX, according to Tria Investment Partners.

"The impending arrival of AQUA II is causing active asset managers to think about the ASX as a distribution channel rather than a competitor," Tria senior consultant Oliver Hesketh said.

 
 

"The next logical step for active managers is to start asking about active ETFs."

Less than 1 per cent of ETFs worldwide are truly active, in that they are based on portfolios managed by asset management teams that make daily fundamental investment decisions.

"The biggest traditional problem with active ETFs is that fund managers must disclose their holdings on a daily basis to the market or at least the members of the fund," Hesketh said.

"Most active managers aren't comfortable with that."

The exception is fixed income, where it is more difficult to replicate a manager's holdings since the assets are not listed on an exchange, but instead are traded over the counter.

In between active and passive ETFs are about $100 billion in products that track a rules-based or custom index, but which aim to outperform an index more commonly associated with the asset class.

High-yield equity indices are one example of such ETFs in Australia.

"While these aren't necessarily trying to outperform the total return of the broader benchmarks, they are providing targeted outcomes classically offered by active managers," Hesketh said.

"We like the prospects for these semi-active ETFs.

"Products with a good chance of success include investment strategies that are difficult to replicate and those which address core needs of significant investor constituencies."

These could be covered call strategies, quant strategies and geared equity strategies.

"It is in these types of products that we expect to see the hype around active ETFs approach the reality," Hesketh said.