Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
30 June 2025 by Laura Dew

State Street rebrands US$4.6tn SSGA investment division

State Street has rebranded its State Street Global Advisors arm, which has US$4.6 trillion in assets under management, following a series of deals ...
icon

VanEck reports investor uptake as ASX bitcoin ETF grows to $290m

Australia’s first bitcoin ETF has marked its one-year anniversary on the ASX, reflecting a broader rise in investor ...

icon

UBS lifts S&P 500 target to 6,200, flags US equities as global portfolio anchor

UBS has raised its year-end S&P 500 target to 6,200, citing easing trade tensions and resilient earnings, and backed ...

icon

ART warns markets ‘incredibly complacent’ over end of tariff pause

The Australian Retirement Trust is adopting a “healthy level of conservatism” towards the US as the end of the 90-day ...

icon

ASIC’s private credit probe expected to home in on retail space

IFM Investors expects ASIC’s ongoing surveillance and action in the private credit market to focus predominately on ...

icon

Don’t write off the US just yet, Fidelity warns

Despite rising geopolitical risks and volatile macro signals, Fidelity has cautioned investors against a full-scale ...

VIEW ALL

Short-selling ban may have increased volatility

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

Although the ban on short selling did achieve some of its objectives, ASIC admits it also increased volatility and decreased liquidity.

The ban on short selling securities in Australia may have increased volatility and reduced market liquidity, ASIC has admitted in a new report.

In a review of the effects of the ban on short selling securities between 2008 and 2009, the corporate regulator acknowledged it did not fully grasp the effects the ban would have on markets and said any future measures would benefit from lessons learned.

"The ban on short selling may have exacerbated market volatility. It also potentially inhibited price discovery in the market and may have reduced market liquidity," ASIC said in the report, "Short Selling: Post-implementation review".

The short-selling measures also may have led to a number of other negative effects on market participants, including higher bid/ask spreads, lower turnover and a reduced ability for price discovery.

"These negative impacts may have been exacerbated by the length of the period of the Australian short-selling ban compared with those in other highly-developed markets," ASIC said.

The corporate regulator also acknowledged some alternative fund managers had incurred significant costs as a result of new compliance requirements and the inability to execute their trading strategies.

"The main costs incurred were the costs to implement reporting and other compliance arrangements and the loss of revenue and business opportunities because of the inability to short sell," it said.

"Some fund managers using alternative investment strategies were significantly affected in this way."

But ASIC also said the ban had delivered on a number of the objectives it aimed to achieve.

"By aligning the regulation of short selling in Australia with the approach taken by other regulators, and requiring permitted short sales to be disclosed, the short-selling measures reduced the risks that might occur as a result of short selling of Australian financial sector entities or other systemically important entities," it said.

"The reduction in settlement failure also assisted in maintaining the orderly functioning of Australian financial markets."

Although the regulator said it would not shy away from considering a short-selling ban in the future, it also indicated a total ban might not be necessary again.

"The market and regulators' understanding of short selling and its impact on trading conditions has deepened over the past three years and any future calls for taking measures similar to those of September 2008 would have the benefit of the lessons learned from the earlier short-selling ban," it said.

"In particular, the disclosure regime for covered short sales and short positions and the, now permanent, prohibition on naked short selling may limit the need for a total ban in future periods of market turmoil."