lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
31 October 2025 by Georgie Preston

China’s turning point beyond the US–China lens

While investor focus often centres on Washington–Beijing relations, China’s diversified trade partnerships reveal a different trend, according to ...
icon

Unregistered MIS operator sentenced over $34m fraud

Unregistered managed investment scheme operator Chris Marco has been sentenced after being found guilty of 43 fraud ...

icon

Banks push to expand Australia’s sustainable finance rules

Australia’s major banks have backed a push to broaden sustainable finance rules, aiming to unlock global capital and ...

icon

September marks strongest ever quarter for gold demand

Gold demand and prices hit fresh records as investors turn to safe-haven assets amid geopolitical volatility and market ...

icon

Ironbark AM partners to expand global qualitative equity access in Australia

Ironbark Asset Management has formed a strategic partnership with US-based global quantitative equity manager Intech ...

icon

Salter Brothers creates ESG-focused platform in PE partnership

Investment manager Salter Brothers has partnered with private equity firm Kilara Capital to launch an Australian ...

VIEW ALL

A new world order - Column

  •  
By Stephen Blaxhall
  •  
2 minute read

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.
 
There are currently seven long-only managers charging performance fees: Platypus, BT, Challenger, Hunter Hall, MIR, Portfolio Partners and Prime Partners. Fees range from 15 to 20.5 basis points.
 
"When we looked at it in more detail the investment objectives of these funds ranged from 4 to 5 per cent above the benchmark, which we thought was appropriate against the benchmark, as it is a large amount of alpha," S&P fund analyst Marcus Hanel said.
 
"Higher fees, including performance fees, are acceptable if the investor is being compensated for the additional cost."
 
However, Hanel said if funds were going to charge a higher performance fee they needed to show a long and successful track record.
 
"If a manager fails to reach its performance objective, they should not be given a second chance until investors have recouped their losses," he said.
 
"I think this will come out in the wash over the next couple of years, I guess, but at the moment some of these managers are performing strongly."
 
He said advisers also needed to keep in mind that they could access good high conviction managers, such as Perpetual and Lazard, that did not charge performance fees.
 
"Fund managers have many alternatives when designing performance-based fee structures, and S&P feels that some fail to align investors' interests with their own," he said.