Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

CDO panic down to ignorance

  •  
By Stephen Blaxhall
  •  
5 minute read

CDO meltown driven by lack of technical ability.

Collateralised debt obligations (CDO), like those at the centre of the recent meltdown by Australian hedge fund Basis Capital, are being used by investment managers that do not understand them, according to a leading investment banker.

Sydney-based Merrill Lynch banker Peter Opie said it was not just retail investors that did not possess the technical ability to trade in CDOs, but many of the sophisticated institutional investors and asset consultants too.

"I don't think they truly understand the risk. They have good return profiles in good markets, but they have equally poor risk profiles in bad markets. Investors fail to understand that they can actually end up losing more than the principal if enough components of the CDO fall over," Opie said.

CDOs contain debt instruments with varying degrees of risk. The riskiest contain non-investment grade bonds or junk bonds and are referred to as equity.

 
 

Schroders head of fixed income Simon Doyle said investors were clearly attracted by the high yields on offer, given the lack of a return in more traditional defensive assets.

"By treating their exposure to these types of assets as being quasi-defensive, investors failed to properly value the risk premium required for the underlying liquidity risk and downside risk potential of these structures - or more likely they simply didn't appreciate that this risk existed," Doyle said.

An underlying default in one of the lower-rated, higher-leveraged tranches can cause a CDO to start to unravel.

"Typically a CDO may have 200 bonds. If one defaults, the coupon may go from 12 per cent to 5 per cent," Opie said.

"If there are two defaults, you may not get a coupon. If three unravel, you are at risk of losing capital and, roughly, if you have five defaults all your capital is gone."

He said he thought CDOs were a legitimate asset class when used properly, but they were just not well enough understood.

Basis Capital recently informed investors that its Basis Yield Alpha Fund lost around 14 per cent in June, while its Basis Pac-Rim Fund dropped 9.2 per cent.