Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
27 June 2025 by [email protected]

ASIC’s private credit probe expected to home in on retail space

IFM Investors expects ASIC’s ongoing surveillance and action in the private credit market to focus predominately on direct investment by retail ...
icon

Don’t write off the US just yet, Fidelity warns

Despite rising geopolitical risks and volatile macro signals, Fidelity has cautioned investors against a full-scale ...

icon

Australia’s economic growth to accelerate despite ‘fragile global environment’

The pace of economic growth in Australia is expected to “grind higher over coming quarters” off the back of lower ...

icon

Super sector welcomes US retreat on tax measure that risked $3.5bn in losses

The superannuation sector has welcomed confirmation that a controversial US tax provision will be removed

icon

Managed fund inflows surge as Australian investors lean into global volatility

Australian investors have poured billions into managed funds in 2025, demonstrating surprising resilience amid global ...

icon

AustralianSuper slammed for alleged ESG breach

The super fund has entered the cross hairs of Market Forces due to its large shareholding in Whitehaven Coal

VIEW ALL

A sign of things to come?

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Much is still unknown about what financial services and superannuation policy would look like under an Abbott government, but a speech given by a Coalition MP to parliament this week indicates industry funds may be in for a rough time.

At 10 minutes to 10pm on Tuesday evening, as most Australians tuned in to watch the Socceroos draw with Japan in the World Cup football qualifier, Paul Fletcher MP, federal member for the safe Liberal seat of Bradfield on Sydney’s upper north shore, gave a speech to an almost-empty parliamentary chamber.

Mr Fletcher, who sits on the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) on Corporations and Financial Services and has often voiced publicly his views on Australian business, took the opportunity to visit an old chestnut for Liberals: the links between trade unions and industry superannuation funds.

“I am very pleased to rise to speak on the issue of the economic power exercised by the major unions in this country through their capacity to appoint directors to industry and public sector superannuation funds, which have funds under management totalling hundreds of billions of dollars,” the former Optus executive told the House of Representatives.

 
 

“This power exercised by the unions through this mechanism reflects the playing out of a strategy adopted by the Hawke-Keating government in the early 1990s under which the so-called equal representation model was established, whereby directors of industry and public sector superannuation funds are appointed in large number by unions,” echoing an oft-voiced pet peeve of the Howard government.

While a Coalition MP rising in parliament to voice concern over the labour movement’s supposed control of industry superannuation is nothing new, Mr Fletcher drew attention to recent Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) figures, indicating this is a rolling issue in Coalition thinking.

Given the central role Mr Fletcher plays as a member of the PJC within the Coalition's financial services policy wonk ranks, super fund chiefs may wish to sit up and take notice.

Mr Fletcher proceeded to present to the House APRA figures pertaining to funds under management of a snapshot of industry funds, and the numbers of super fund directors appointed by some of the most prominent trade unions.

“The most recent statistics issued by APRA in January show that there are 71 funds that APRA classifies as public sector or industry funds,” he said.

“If you look at the annual reports of these 71 funds, you discover that the total funds under management exceeds $380 billion — so, by any measure, a very large amount. 

“Across these 71 public industry and public sector funds, analysis of their annual reports reveals a total of 551 directors and, of these directors, 171 were appointed by unions, and a majority of those directors appointed by unions were union officials.

“It is particularly instructive to look at which unions appoint large numbers of directors across some of the major funds. There is a very clear pattern in which large unions and large union peak bodies extend their influence across a large number of major superannuation funds.”

In conclusion, Mr Fletcher drew attention to aspects of the Fair Work Australia reforms – instigated by the Rudd-Gillard governments – that have, in his view, exacerbated union control of superannuation funds.

This trend is “continuing to play out today in a very significant way”, he said.