Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
15 August 2025 by Georgie Preston

Fund managers push back on passive, say active ETF fees justified

As investor flows into fixed income ETFs accelerate, active managers are mounting a defence of their higher fees, arguing that in bond markets, ...
icon

Rest and ART push ASIC to ease rules, boost capital flow into housing

Two of Australia’s largest industry super funds have thrown their support behind an ASIC review into how stamp duty is ...

icon

Do CBA’s numbers signal trouble ahead?

CBA’s share price has fallen more than 6 per cent over the past week – coinciding, intriguingly, with a record cash ...

icon

ASX now ‘undervalued’ after tech glitches and CHESS project woes

A research firm says errors are a “natural part” of running a company with humans and has reversed its previous poor ...

icon

Oliver’s wish list for economic reform: More output, less red tape

AMP’s chief economist has unveiled a wish list for the Australian government’s Economic Reform Roundtable

icon

AI driving growth beyond traditional investments, says Betashares strategist

AI investment is entering a new frontier with China ramping up its investment in the technology. Ahead of next week’s ...

VIEW ALL

ASIC looks to broaden AFSL regime

ASIC has backed a Financial System Inquiry proposal that fund administrators and technology providers become required to hold Australian Financial Services Licences.

In its response to the FSI interim report, the corporate regulator noted that the day-to-day functioning of the financial services industry is heavily reliant on data vendors, front and middle office vendors, back office vendors and exchange and clearing vendors.

“This reliance means that outages or system malfunctions at a technology service provider that provides a large proportion of the industry with services have the capacity to affect the fair and orderly functioning of Australia’s financial markets,” said ASIC.

However, there is currently “limited regulatory visibility and oversight” of technology providers of “sufficient scale” in Australia, said the submission.

 
 

“A regulatory model to oversee technology service providers of sufficient scale would assist in addressing or mitigating the risks posed by these entities to the fair and orderly operation of Australia’s financial markets,” said ASIC.

The imposition of AFSL requirements would require technology providers to have adequate risk management systems in place, said the submission.

ASIC has also supported the FSI policy option of requiring investment administrators and fund administrators to hold an AFSL.

“The functions provided by such administrators are systemically important for the funds management industry,” said the submission.

“The safety of managed fund and superannuation fund assets is critical given the significant volume of assets in the industry and the concentration of services with a few major entities,” it said.

Under ASIC’s oversight, all breach reports by administrator licensees would be handled centrally rather than “more unsystematically through the responsible entity or registrable superannuation entity”, said the submission.

“There would be more visibility and transparency associated with potential systemic issues that may emerge from outdated administration systems or technology,” said ASIC.

Finally, there would be a regulatory "level playing field” between entities with an in-house administrator and entities with an outsourced administrator, said the submission.