Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement

Slater and Gordon explores potential class action relating to Shield, First Guardian

  •  
By Keith Ford
  •  
3 minute read

The national law firm said it is investigating claims that investors were allegedly advised to put their super into largely unreliable funds.

Slater and Gordon Lawyers has announced it is looking into a potential class action related to the First Guardian and Shield managed investment schemes.

Following both Keystone Asset Management, the responsible entity for the Shield Master Fund, and Falcon Capital, the RE for the First Guardian Master Fund, entering liquidation, investors have been left with uncertainty over how much of the roughly $1 billion in combined assets held in the funds would be recoverable.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched a range of investigations across the parties involved.

Earlier this month, deputy chair Sarah Court said the regulator’s investigations are looking at the entire chain, including conduct of the lead generators, the financial advisers, the superannuation platforms, “who we think have a real role here”, and the research houses that “listed these funds as investable”.

Noting concerns that First Guardian and Shield were “allegedly operating a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australians’ superannuation savings”, Slater and Gordon announced it is investigating a potential class action on behalf of investors.

Andy Wei, Slater and Gordon principal lawyer in class actions, said the firm is looking into the matter and the claims that investors were advised to put their super into “largely unreliable funds”.

“What we’re seeing here is potentially deliberate misleading of investors, many of whom are everyday Australians looking to secure their nest eggs. They were repeatedly assured that their superannuation would flow into diversified portfolios with steady returns,” Wei said.

“However, recent information shows that these funds were largely illiquid with their values grossly overstated.”

Noting that the illiquid assets could be harder to recover without “significant loss of value”, he added that the recovery process could still leave “more than 12,000 Australians out of pocket”.

“These are people’s savings and they deserve far better than this,” Wei said.

“Superannuation is meant to be tightly regulated and many investors likely believed their money was safely managed by trusted, blue-chip superannuation companies.”

The class action lead also called for impacted investors to contact the firm, which will help it assess if a class action is viable.

“We are particularly concerned for investors in First Guardian Master Fund, as FTI Consulting – the liquidators for First Guardian – have now confirmed that they expect ‘a substantial shortfall of recoverable assets’,” Wei added.

The most recent class action involving a financial services firm’s collapse ended with Dixon Advisory parent company E&P Financial settling for just $16 million despite client losses in the hundreds of millions – leaving the tab to be picked up through the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort.

The settlement, as announced in November 2023, included E&P covering $4 million and its professional indemnity insurance covering the remaining $12 million, and was reached without admission of liability.