For some, this only confirms the perception of EM as a purely short‑term, tactical allocation—offering potentially high returns, but at a cost of heightened risk and volatility. However, this traditional thinking no longer fairly represents today’s emerging markets, highlighting the need for a more granular approach to investing.
Emerging markets make up a significant part of the world. While definitions vary, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) currently classifies 162 countries as emerging or developing economies and 41 countries as advanced economies. Understanding the universe in detail, and the nuances that exist between countries, assumes even greater importance when one considers the still relatively scarce level of analyst coverage.
Myth 1: Slowing global growth means avoid emerging markets
The playbook for investing in emerging markets has changed, with decisions no longer predominantly driven by the stage of the global economic cycle. The increasingly domestically driven nature of many EM economies means they are much less dependent on external factors. While these are still influential, they are part of a broader mosaic, alongside fundamental influences at country, sector, and stock‑specific levels. In addition to differences by country, EM offer a varied menu of assets to invest in, including hard currency sovereign and corporate debt and local currency debt, as well as deeper, more mature, equity markets.
The external environment has also materially changed in recent years, and the steep increase in developed market interest rates, particularly in the U.S., is set to persist for longer than initially anticipated. The impact of this policy tightening is being felt disproportionately across emerging debt markets, with a clear division opening up in the landscape. On one side is a group of countries, including Mexico and the larger economies in South America (e.g., Brazil, Chile, Peru, Colombia), that are underpinned by robust fundamentals. This group continues to be able to access credit markets, and spreads have remained reasonable and relatively stable. On the other side is a set of fundamentally weaker EM countries that, as a result, are finding credit markets increasingly closed off to them.
Myth 2: Emerging markets offer few defensive qualities
One of the biggest investor misconceptions is that EM are all about dynamic, growth‑oriented companies, while more defensive, value‑oriented opportunities are few and far between. Asset flows confirm this perception, with data showing that the bulk of all active money flowing into the EM equity universe is invested in growth/core strategies, while only a fraction of total flows is invested in value‑focused strategies. This huge bias means that a lot of value‑oriented opportunities, particularly in traditional “old economy” areas like manufacturing, are being overlooked or ignored. Consequently, there are many good businesses flying under the radar at potentially very depressed prices.
The current environment of increased global uncertainty only adds to the appeal of these value‑oriented EM companies, given the sensitivity of growth‑oriented investments to higher interest rates. Companies with relatively low‑risk profiles, reasonable price‑to‑earnings levels, and predictable earnings streams may not fit the traditional view of a “dynamic” EM investment, but these businesses exist. The beauty of these durable companies is that, over time, they can deliver significant compounded returns.
Myth 3: The risk of error, from central banks or company management, is greater in emerging markets
Significant reform measures have been implemented in many EM countries. Detailed research is central in identifying those countries that are truly committed to consistent, market‑friendly policy direction while helping to avoid those that are moving in the wrong direction. Similarly, on the corporate side, great strides have been made in terms of improving governance and becoming more shareholder focused.
Over the past 25 years, when sharp sell‑offs have occurred in EM debt markets, they have proved relatively short‑lived, creating opportunities to enter the market at potentially very depressed valuation levels. At a broad level, companies are generating more free cash flow, compared with previous decades, as management teams pay more attention to spending and other capital allocation decisions. In the current environment, selectivity will be key—identifying those countries with stronger, domestically driven economies and companies geared to the domestic economy where earnings growth and profit margins look sustainable or can potentially improve.
Myth 4: The growth potential of emerging markets will be more subdued going forward
The growth of EM debt as an asset class in recent years means that investors can access a much deeper, and more diverse, range of credit opportunities. While we recognize that market uncertainty and a mixed global economic outlook are important influences on the broad EM outlook, these need to be weighed against the strengths of individual domestic economies and the positive secular trends that continue to support long‑term optimism in EM generally.
For example, many EM countries continue to enjoy positive economic growth at rates well ahead of developed markets. This is indicative of burgeoning economies that are less dependent on the developed world to prosper. Internal trade between EM economies has now surpassed external trade volumes with developed market economies, while a growing EM middle class is supportive of long‑term domestic demand.
EM still have a lot of room to potentially improve productivity and catch up with developed market peers. Large, young, and increasingly educated workforces are central to closing this gap, along with the broadening adoption of technology. However, delivering on this potential is becoming increasingly differentiated.
Myth 5: ESG considerations significantly lag developed market peers
While environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has entered the mainstream in developed markets, there is an ongoing perception that less importance is attached to these factors in EM. However, EM companies have made great progress in improving their ESG credentials in recent years, with many businesses today displaying standards in line with global best practices.
Issuance of sustainable bonds in EM has also noticeably increased in recent years, driven by\ robust issuance from some relatively new participants, including the Philippines, Mexico, Colombia, and Chile. This adds to the prominent issuance in more seasoned markets, like China. While EM are still well behind advanced economy issuance, this is a trend we expect to continue as EM sovereigns increasingly look to finance their sustainable development goals.
It is also worth highlighting the huge investment made by China in recent years in transitioning from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources. China is now the world's largest producer of wind and solar energy and also the largest domestic and outbound investor in renewable energy. This seismic shift is creating knock‑on benefits for EM countries and companies geared to this transition, as well as having positive implications for energy security and affordability across the EM region.
While the slowdown in global demand poses a key near‑term challenge for EM, this kind of environment tends to create significant opportunities for informed, research‑driven investors as weak sentiment and traditional investor thinking heighten the potential for overselling. This is no single, homogenous entity, but rather a diverse universe of many countries, each at a different stage in its growth cycle, and with varying demographic and industry influences. In the near term, we anticipate stronger, domestically driven EM economies to perform best, as they detach from export‑oriented counterparts more directly impacted by slowing global growth. Longer term, EM remain a dynamic area of investment, offering superior growth potential relative to developed markets.
Chris Kushlis, head of China and emerging markets macro strategy, T. Rowe Price
