Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
investor daily logo

Research sheds light on meaningful material impact of ESG performance

  •  
  •  
4 minute read

A new study has evaluated the business impact of controversial ESG-related events.

A company’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance has a strong impact on its market value, new research by Moody’s Analytics has determined.

The firm analysed the effects of ESG-related controversies such as chemical spills, child labour and cases of corruption and bribery across more than 3,000 companies worldwide, and determined their material effects. 

“We found that there is a meaningful benefit to a responsible ‘ESG risk management culture’ within a firm that can have a potentially material effect on equity returns,” said Moody’s Analytics MD Douglas Dwyer. 

==
==

“ESG controversies can inflict reputational damage with significant financial and legal repercussions. Firms that actively manage these risks do a better job of boosting shareholder value.”

According to the firm, companies which experienced controversial ESG events suffered “large, statistically significant negative abnormal equity returns” both over the short term and a 12-month horizon.

Specifically, ESG events considered moderate to severe, resulted in an abnormal stock market loss of between -1.3 per cent and -7.5 per cent over 12 months.

With a median market capitalisation of US$11.7 billion ($17.0 billion), this equates to a loss of approximately US$400 million ($580 million) in one year for the average company analysed.

Moody’s found that when an ESG controversy of any kind occurred, companies experienced an abnormal return of -0.37 per cent over two months. Losses extended to -0.73 per cent for firms that suffered two or more controversies and -1.40 per cent for four or more.

In the short run, the effect of social-related controversies was considered large and statistically significant, in contrast to both environmental and governance controversies.

In fact, companies which experienced three or more social controversies in a month had an average abnormal return of -2.11 per cent.

Over one year, an abnormal return of -1.18 per cent was reported for companies that had three or more ESG controversies in a single month and -6.47 per cent for five or more.

In a separate study, Moody’s Analytics also concluded that companies with a history of controversial ESG-related events were more likely to experience controversies in the future.

However, companies that improved their internal ESG risk practices in light of experiencing a controversy later experienced about 15 per cent fewer controversies than those that didn't.

“Together, the results of these research studies show the relevance of ESG controversies to a firm’s financial performance and, importantly, that companies can influence their ESG risk management cultures, while benefiting shareholders and other stakeholders,” said Mr Dwyer.

Jon Bragg

Jon Bragg

Jon Bragg is a journalist for Momentum Media's Investor Daily, nestegg and ifa. He enjoys writing about a wide variety of financial topics and issues and exploring the many implications they have on all aspects of life.