While the national debate has turned to superannuation, with the Treasurer explicitly stating that funds need to do more to address major challenges facing the country, IFM Investors' CEO, David Neal, said he is confident the government won't meddle in how funds invest their money.
The Treasurer's words, given in August as part of a wider announcement of impending super reforms, led to a commentary about the role of super funds in pursuing so-called “national interest” projects and what that would mean to returns.
But, addressing the National Conference of the Governance Institute of Australia on Tuesday, Mr Neal said “it is simply nonsense to think that major industry superannuation funds or IFM would make an investment that was not in the best financial interests of members”.
“We all have fiduciary obligations to investors,” Mr Neal said, adding that “funds are simply not going to make investments that don't make sense financially”.
However, IFM Investors does agree with the Treasurer on one thing — the need for superannuation funds to up their involvement in the energy transition.
According to Mr Neal, the failure to transition to net zero will inflict a 40 per cent reduction in asset value.
“You can't stock pick your way out of systemic risks like climate change. And risks like this are impossible to diversify away from,” Mr Neal said.
“They will and are impacting our entire economy. And these impacts will compound such that future market returns will deteriorate and many of the superannuation members we are investing for will have much lower retirement incomes as a result.”
Mr Neal believes that investors like IFM need to be working to strengthen the system itself, not just individual assets within it. This, he said, means understanding how “our investment activity and the activity of our assets might influence the health of the economic, environmental and social system around us”.
“Healthy long-term investment returns are dependent on healthy environmental and social systems, now and in the future,” Mr Neal said.
He pointed to scenario analysis by the European Central Bank which found that under a disorderly transition to net zero, European investment funds would see losses of up to 14 per cent of portfolio assets relative to an orderly transition through 2035.
This, he noted, “constitutes a failure of our fiduciary obligations to investors”.
As such, he detailed the IFM Investors' “two investment imperatives” to address the systemic risk of climate change.
“The first investment imperative is to invest in developing the new assets that our system needs if it is to be healthy,” Mr Neal said. This, in the infrastructure context, includes building clean energy and the supporting infrastructure around it.
The second investment imperative will see the provider of investment services direct capital into an existing stock of assets to accelerate the transition to the new clean economy.
“My view here is that responsible investing means improving long-term returns by being responsible to the society around us. And in this context, it means being willing, and indeed keen, to buy assets with significant emission profiles, and investing to support a transition plan to get those emissions down,” Mr Neal said.
Finally, Mr Neal said, collaboration among super funds is key and the government's involvement is welcome.
“Strengthening the environmental, social, and economic systems on which broad prosperity depends will often directly contribute to long-term investment returns, and I'd argue that where this line of sight can be drawn, fiduciaries are duty-bound to consider how they can play a role in this strengthening process.”
Owned by Australia's industry super funds, IFM currently manages just under $200 billion in assets.
Maja Garaca Djurdjevic
Maja's career in journalism spans well over a decade across finance, business and politics. Now an experienced editor and reporter across all elements of the financial services sector, prior to joining Momentum Media, Maja reported for several established news outlets in Southeast Europe, scrutinising key processes in post-conflict societies.
