Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
22 July 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

A July rate cut would have been inconsistent with RBA’s strategy, minutes reveal

“Slow and steady” appears to be the Reserve Bank’s approach to monetary policy as the board continues to hold on to its wait-and-see method
icon

ASIC singles out funds for further review in private credit probe

The corporate regulator is conducting further surveillance on numerous private credit funds as part of its broader ...

icon

Submissions open for Women in Finance Awards 2025

Submissions and nominations are now open for the highly anticipated Women in Finance Awards 2025. The Women in ...

icon

AMP reports strong growth for super with first positive net cash flows since 2017

AMP Limited has reported its first positive quarterly net cash flows in superannuation and investments since 2017, ...

icon

Insignia takeover still on hold as PE bids dry up

The prospect of a deal materialising between Insignia Financial and CC Capital remains uncertain following the latest ...

icon

Trump’s plans to open 401ks to crypto an ‘unprecedented shift’ for markets, experts say

A move by US President Donald Trump to allow American retirement funds to invest in cryptocurrency would help legitimise ...

VIEW ALL

Chinese commodity demand could drop in 2013

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

China is on the verge of an economic rebalancing exercise, which will impact the Australian economy significantly, a China specialist says.

There is a growing awareness among China's political leaders that a rebalancing of the country's economy is needed if the ongoing misallocation of capital into unviable investments is to cease.

While an adjustment of investment spending will lead to a more sustainable growth of the Chinese economy in the long term, it will hit economies that are heavily dependent on commodity exports, including the Australian economy, Beijing University Graduate School of Management professor Michael Pettis said yesterday.

"By definition, rebalancing must mean significant contraction in investments and if there is a significant contraction in investments then Chinese non-food commodities imports are going to drop dramatically," Pettis, the Washington think-tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace senior associate, said.

"My expectation is that.. China begins the adjustment process, I hope, in 2013, 2014, because the longer they put it off, the more likely we will end up with a debt problem.

"Once they begin the adjustment, I expect the global demand for non-food commodities to drop significantly. And unfortunately I think that will affect certain economies, like Brazil, like Australia and others."

Speaking at the CFA Institute's Australia Investment Conference 2011, Pettis argued that there has been a lot of misallocation of capital to investment projects that are not commercially viable, including infrastructure projects.

"[They] are building infrastructure on top of infrastructure. There are 45 new airports in the making," he said.

Pettis said a likely catalyst for a rebalancing of the economy was a change in leadership in the Chinese Communist Party next year, when the next generation of leaders will start to assume responsibility.

"There is a great hope among many of us that when the new leadership comes in 2012, they will begin steps to rebalance," he said.

"There is even a growing sense among economists in Beijing that growth rates are going to slow significantly."

"We now suddenly hear talk about 5,6, 7 per cent growth rates (of gross domestic product (GDP))."

"The problem is that if they are overly optimistic. For China to rebalance, I think growth rates in the next decade are going to average around 3 per cent," he said.

Pettis argued China will not be able to hold off on rebalancing the economy for long, because it will exacerbate the problem.

"The longer it postpones adjustment, the more misallocation there is," he said. "And the consequence of misallocation is an increase in debt."

"If there is a lot of this unserviceable debt the only way we can serve it is by transferring directly or indirectly from household savings," he said.

"The more debt you have, the more important those transfers from the household sectors are in order to keep the financial system viable and the more important those transfers the harder it is for households incomes to rise quickly enough to cause a surge in consumption."

"So they are caught in a trap and there is no easy way out," Pettis said.