Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
22 July 2025 by Miranda Brownlee

Agentic AI to drive major shift in funds management in coming years: Robeco

The international asset manager expects AI will reach a point in the near future where it can autonomously manage investments within certain ...
icon

Insignia agrees to $3.3bn CC Capital takeover bid

Private equity firm CC Capital is set to acquire 100 per cent of financial services firm Insignia. Following a ...

icon

Bonds are back with best conditions in 2 decades, says BlackRock

Higher-for-longer policy rates have created the best income-earning environment for bonds since pre-GFC. BlackRock’s ...

icon

RBA minutes reveal ‘cautious and gradual’ approach to interest rate cuts

“Slow and steady” appears to be the Reserve Bank’s approach to monetary policy as the board continues to hold on to its ...

icon

ASIC singles out funds for further review in private credit probe

The corporate regulator is conducting further surveillance on numerous private credit funds as part of its broader ...

icon

Submissions open for Women in Finance Awards 2025

Submissions and nominations are now open for the highly anticipated Women in Finance Awards 2025. The Women in ...

VIEW ALL

AIST flags concerns over opt-in

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

AIST wants broader application of opt-in.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has expressed concerns over the  opt-in legislation as proposed in the first tranche of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.

AIST said in a submission to Treasury today that it strongly supports the intent of proposed FOFA reforms, but said it had concerns with how the new rules primarily apply to new clients under the opt-in proposal.

The draft legislation for the proposed opt-in requirements now only applies to new clients and the definition is very broad and open to abuse, AIST said.

AIST would like to see the opt-in requirement applied to all clients receiving ongoing advice.

 
 

However, based on the legislation at hand we recommend the exclusion be applied only to those clients who actually received personal advice.

"This is a critical package of reforms that we have to get right - not only to protect consumers, but to generate greater trust and professionalism across the financial advisory industry," AIST policy and research manager Tom Garcia said.

The institute also said a fee disclosure statement should be provided to all clients on an annual basis in addition and regardless of any opt-in requirements and argued for a renewal notice to be provided to all clients who are part of a client book that has been sold to another provider.

The institute recommended that 'best interests obligations' should be principles based as a more prescriptive approach, such as a checklist for advice, could create loopholes or a situation where the checklist is used as template for advice.

AIST said the draft legislation was also too vague on the application of scaled advice.

It also said ASIC should have increased auditing capabilities in addition to its extended licensing and banning powers.