Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
10 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns over cost-cutting, offshoring ...
icon

How $2.68tn is spread across products and investments

Australia’s $2.68 trillion superannuation system is being shaped not only by the dominance of MySuper and Choice ...

icon

Private credit growth triggers caution at Yarra Capital

As private credit emerges as a fast-growing asset class, Yarra Capital Management remains cautious about the risks that ...

icon

CBA flags end of global rate-cutting cycle

The major bank has indicated that central banks are nearing the end of their rate-cutting cycles, while Trump’s pressure ...

icon

ETF market nears $300bn as international equities lead inflows

The Australian ETF industry is on the cusp of hitting $300 billion in assets under management, with VanEck forecasting ...

icon

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s ...

VIEW ALL

AIST flags concerns over opt-in

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

AIST wants broader application of opt-in.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has expressed concerns over the  opt-in legislation as proposed in the first tranche of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.

AIST said in a submission to Treasury today that it strongly supports the intent of proposed FOFA reforms, but said it had concerns with how the new rules primarily apply to new clients under the opt-in proposal.

The draft legislation for the proposed opt-in requirements now only applies to new clients and the definition is very broad and open to abuse, AIST said.

AIST would like to see the opt-in requirement applied to all clients receiving ongoing advice.

 
 

However, based on the legislation at hand we recommend the exclusion be applied only to those clients who actually received personal advice.

"This is a critical package of reforms that we have to get right - not only to protect consumers, but to generate greater trust and professionalism across the financial advisory industry," AIST policy and research manager Tom Garcia said.

The institute also said a fee disclosure statement should be provided to all clients on an annual basis in addition and regardless of any opt-in requirements and argued for a renewal notice to be provided to all clients who are part of a client book that has been sold to another provider.

The institute recommended that 'best interests obligations' should be principles based as a more prescriptive approach, such as a checklist for advice, could create loopholes or a situation where the checklist is used as template for advice.

AIST said the draft legislation was also too vague on the application of scaled advice.

It also said ASIC should have increased auditing capabilities in addition to its extended licensing and banning powers.