Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
22 July 2025 by Miranda Brownlee

Agentic AI to drive major shift in funds management in coming years: Robeco

The international asset manager expects AI will reach a point in the near future where it can autonomously manage investments within certain ...
icon

Insignia agrees to $3.3bn CC Capital takeover bid

Private equity firm CC Capital is set to acquire 100 per cent of financial services firm Insignia. Following a ...

icon

Bonds are back with best conditions in 2 decades, says BlackRock

Higher-for-longer policy rates have created the best income-earning environment for bonds since pre-GFC. BlackRock’s ...

icon

RBA minutes reveal ‘cautious and gradual’ approach to interest rate cuts

“Slow and steady” appears to be the Reserve Bank’s approach to monetary policy as the board continues to hold on to its ...

icon

ASIC singles out funds for further review in private credit probe

The corporate regulator is conducting further surveillance on numerous private credit funds as part of its broader ...

icon

Submissions open for Women in Finance Awards 2025

Submissions and nominations are now open for the highly anticipated Women in Finance Awards 2025. The Women in ...

VIEW ALL

Work still needed on lifecycle funds

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

Lifecycle funds need some tweaking before trustees can use them as MySuper options.

Lifecycle funds still require further development before they can be used as MySuper options, a financial risk management firm has said.

Under the Stronger Super reforms, published on Tuesday, superannuation fund trustees will be allowed to use lifecycle funds as their MySuper options.

"Trustees are best placed to decide whether a lifecycle investment option is best suited to their members," Treasury said in its Stronger Super information pack.

"Therefore, the Government has decided that trustees will be allowed to use a lifecycle investment option as the single investment strategy for their MySuper product."

 
 

Milliman financial risk management practice leader Wade Matterson is researching the evolution of lifecycle funds.

"I think the proposal is a good one, however, the question remains as to what is an appropriate lifecycle fund," he said.

Matterson point out that in the United States, lifecycle, or target date funds as they are called there, faced a lot of criticism after the global financial crisis, because they endured heavy losses, due to a number of issues including, fees, comparability, conflicts of interest and lack of risk management.

Lifecycle investment options automatically adjust a member's asset allocation to lower risk investments as a member gets older.

The funds can be relevant to members who transition to retirement, but the pace at which the investment mix is changed and the disregard for market movements has caused problems in market downturns.

"Since then there have been a number of improvements to the concept, but there is still lot of work to be done," Matterson said.

The government has announced that the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority will develop guidance for trustees on issues related to the way in which they develop and maintain a lifecycle investment approach for a MySuper product.